Innocent or Not, Kavanaugh’s Partisan Rage Was Disqualifying
Liberals do not want Brett Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court because they believe that his jurisprudence poses a threat to consumers, workers, women’s bodily autonomy, voting rights, the independence of federal law enforcement, the government’s capacity to regulate private industry, and various other constituencies and issues that they care about.
Liberals also believe that, as a general rule, Supreme Court justices should not be unrepentant sex offenders, perjurers, or vengeful partisans.
By contrast, the people who have the power to make or break Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination like his approach to Constitutional law. Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, and Jeff Flake are perfectly fine with Kavanaugh’s jurisprudence. But they have evinced some concerns about his character. For this reason, in recent days, Democrats have focused their case against Kavanaugh on two related “character” issues:
AGR; Imagine you are coming before this judge and you fit one of these groups that he raged against. Wouldn’t you sue him or force him to step aside if your case is being heard by the Supreme Court, because he has shown extreme prejudice against you specifically?