The following research papers and studies raise doubts that COVID vaccine mandates are backed by science and good public-health practice.
Anyone seeking to challenge these mandates should carefully consult these studies, which demonstrate how the mandates provide no overall health benefit to the community and can even be harmful.
Individuals should decide whether to get the vaccine based on their own assessment of risks in consultation with informed medical professionals.
The model of Marek’s disease (“leaky” non-sterilizing, non-neutralizing vaccines that reduce symptoms but do not stop infection or transmission) and the concept of the Original Antigenic Sin (the initial priming of the immune system prejudices the immune response to the pathogen or similar pathogen life-long) may explain what we are potentially facing now with these mass mandates of COVID vaccines: immune escape, increased transmission, faster transmission and potentially more “hotter” variants.
Mandates result in the forced separation and segregation of society. They create hazards for people in their professional lives. For example, why would governments impose punitive career-altering vaccine mandates on an unvaccinated nurse who is most likely already immune due to natural exposure?
Mandates also represent an encroachment on freedom and liberties, and call into question the motives behind these mandates when the science shows no public benefit compared with the costs.
Below are 21 studies that call into question COVID-19 vaccine mandates:21 Studies Showing Vaccine Mandates Aren’t Based on Science • Children’s Health Defense