History, Locations, Country Totals, Types, Amounts Of Radioactive Nuclear Waste And Reactors Dumped In Oceans And Seas

History, Locations, Country Totals, Types, Amounts Of Radioactive Nuclear Waste And Reactors Dumped In Oceans And Seas




According to the Bellona Foundation, citing the Norwegian Radiation Protection Authorities (NRPA)

Read more at; http://www.businessinsider.com/potential-chernobyl-like-disaster-in-arctic-2015-2#ixzz3Rg6cxaUR

Plutonium containing RTG’s at South Pole, some were ‘lost’.

The first signs that there could be trouble on the horizon came in early 1993 when seals in the White Sea and Barents Sea were found to be dying from blood cancer. 


Dana reports on radioactive garbage dumped into the ocean historically; Atomic Waste, Reported Leaking in Ocean Sanctuary Off California, 8 million liters of contaminated waste into the sea on a daily basis, England, Sellafield most radioactive sea in the world, 40 ships loaded with toxic and radioactive waste have disappeared in Mediterranean waters since 1994, Russia announces enormous finds of radioactive waste and nuclear reactors in Arctic seas, Somalia 600 barrels of toxic and nuclear waste, as well as radioactive hospital waste, plus more at video; 
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
“From 1946 through 1993, thirteen countries (fourteen, if the USSR and Russia are considered separately) used ocean disposal or ocean dumping as a method to dispose of nuclear/radioactive waste. The waste materials included both liquids and solids housed in various containers, as well as reactor vessels, with and without spent or damaged nuclear fuel.[1] Since 1993, ocean disposal has been banned by international treaties. (London Convention (1972), Basel Convention, MARPOL 73/78)
However, according to the United Nations, some companies have been dumping radioactive waste and other hazardous materials into the coastal waters of Somalia, taking advantage of the fact that the country had no functioning government from the early 1990s onwards. According to one official at the United Nations, this caused health problems for locals in the coastal region and posed a significant danger to Somalia’s fishing industry and local marine life.[2]
Ocean floor disposal” (or sub-seabed disposal)—a more deliberate method of delivering radioactive waste to the ocean floor and depositing it into the seabed—was studied by the UK and Sweden, but never implemented.[3]


Data are from IAEA-TECDOC-1105.[1] page 3-4
1946 First dumping operation at Northeast Pacific Ocean (about 80 km off the coast of California
1957 First IAEA Advisory Group Meeting on Radioactive Waste Disposal into the Sea
1958 First United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS I)
1972 Adoption of the Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter (London Convention 1972)
1975 The London Convention 1972 entered into force (Prohibition of dumping of high level radioactive waste.)
1983 Moratorium on low-level waste dumping
1988 Assessing the Impact of Deep Sea Disposal of Low-level Radioactive Waste on Living Marine Resources. IAEA Technical Reports Series No. 288
1990 Estimation of Radiation Risks at Low Dose. IAEA-TECDOC-557
1993 Russia reported the dumping of high level nuclear waste including spent fuel by former USSR.
1994 Feb-20 Total prohibition of disposal at sea came into force
1946-93Data are from IAEA-TECDOC-1105.[1] Summary of pages 27-120


Disposal projects attempted to locate ideal dumping site for depth, stability and current and to treat, solidify and contain the waste. However some dumping only diluted the waste with surface water, or containers that imploded at depth. Even containers that survived the pressure physically decay over time.


Country total at the major site.
SU: Soviet Union (39,243TBq) and Russia (2.8TBq),
GB: UK (35,088TBq),
CH: Switzerland (4,419TBq),
BE: Belgium (2,120TBq).
US: United States of America (3,496TBq),
JP: Japan (15TBq),
KR: South Korea (?TBq),
NZ: New Zealand (1+TBq).
France (354TBq),
Germany (0.2TBq),
Italy (0.2TBq),
the Netherland (336TBq),
Sweden (3.2TBq) are within GB marker.

USSR, UK, Switzerland, US, Belgium, France, the Netherlands, Japan, Sweden, Russia, New Zealand, Germany, Italy and Korea dumped waste at over 100 dumping sites.


A total of 85.1×1015 Becquerel (Bq) (initial radioactivity at the time of dump) of radioactive waste were disposed at sea.


Global fallout of nuclear weapon tests,             2,566,087x1015Bq.[5]

1986 Chernobyl disaster total release              12,060x1015Bq.[6]

One container (net 400kg) of vitrified high level radioactive waste has an average 4x1015Bq (Max 45x1015Bq).

Some countries report the mass and volume of disposed waste and some just tonnage. The US did not report tonnage or volume of 90,543 containers.
Subtotal of all volume reported is 982,394m3


Data are from IAEA-TECDOC-1105.[1]:6–7, 14
Liquid waste
unpackaged and diluted in surface waters
contained in package but not solidified
Solid waste
low level waste like resins, filters, material used for decontamination processes, etc., solidified with cement or bitumen and packaged in metal containers
unpackaged solid waste, mainly large parts of nuclear installations (steam generators, pumps, lids of reactor pressure vessels, etc.
Reactor vessels
without nuclear fuel,
containing damaged spent nuclear fuel solidified with polymer agent
special container with damaged spent nuclear fuel (icebreaker Lenin by the former Soviet Union)

Ocean disposal (unit TBq = 1012Bq)


Mainly at the east coast of Novaya Zemlya at Kara Sea and relatively small proportion at Barentz Sea by USSR. Dumped at 20 sites from 1959–92,[4]total of 222x103m3 including reactors and spent fuel.

Arctic ocean dump sites of radioactive waste. SU: Soviet Union (38,369TBq), RU: Russia (0.7TBq), SE: Sweden.


The Atomic Sailors (video)

Harvey Ray Lucas served in the late 1950s on the USS Calhoun County, a low-ranking Navy ship whose primary mission was to dump atomic and other military waste into the Atlantic Ocean. Lucas spent four years heaving radioactive materials over the side of the ship. After leaving the military, he suffered from chronic health problems and sired five children with birth defects. Lucas’s testimony made my jaw drop. He described one baby whose skin oozed “bloodwater.” He described the birth and death of another whom physicians termed an “anencephalic female monster.” A couple years after his testimony, Lucas died of a rare cancer associated with radiation exposure. I interviewed Deane Horne, whose teeth and hair had fallen out after he left the ship and whose eldest son was born without a femur. I interviewed Richard Tkaczyk, who had also lost his teeth and whose first born son had seizures and brain damage. I interviewed George Albernaz, who was half paralyzed after suffering from an odd brain disease that his physician called radiation necrosis. All had filed claims with the VA. None had made any headway.

Dumping occurred from 1948 to 1982. 78% of dumping in the Atlantic was done by UK (35,088TBq), followed by Switzerland (4,419TBq), USA (2,924TBq) and Belgium (2,120TBq). Sunken USSR nuclear submarines are not included. see List of sunken nuclear submarines

137x103tonnes were dumped by 8 European countries. USA reported neither tonnage nor volume for 34,282 containers.

B: Belgium (2,120TBq), F: France (354TBq), D: Germany (0.2TBq), I: Italy (0.2TBq), N: the Netherlands (336TBq), S: Sweden (3.2TBq), C: Switzerland (4,419TBq), G:United Kingdom (35,088TBq), US: United States of America (2,942TBq), SU: Soviet Union.


USSR 874 TBq
USA 554 TBq
Japan 15.1TBq
New Zealand 1+TBq
South Korea. unknown amount
751x103m3 were dumped by Japan and USSR
USA reported neither tonnage nor volume of 56,261 containers.

JP: Japan (15.1TBq), KR: South Korea (?TBq), NZ: New Zealand (1+TBq), RU: Russia (2.1TBq), SU: Soviet Union (874TBq), US: United States of America (554TBq).


USSR dumped 749TBq in the Sea of Japan, Japan dumped 15.1TBq south of main island. South Korea dumped 45 tonnes (unknown radioactivity value) in the Sea of Japan.

Dump sites in the Sea of Japan. Sites off coast of Nakhodka are of USSR and RU=Russia.


Most of what is dumped, spilled or accidentally released into the world’s oceans is NOT COUNTED.
The Wikipedia entry should be considered to be a very light guess, maybe 1% at best, of the total amount of radiation dumped either illegally or under cover of secrecy in the worlds rivers and/or oceans.
Massive And Uncontrolled Radioactive Waste Dumping In Oceans Continues On Even Today via @AGreenRoad
Today, ocean dumping of radioactive waste continues via Fukushima dumping 400 tons of highly radioactive water into the Pacific ocean. Japan is trucking high level nuclear waste all over Japan, burning it, and them dumping the ashed into Tokyo Bay. The burning of radioactive waste all over Japan continues to this day, as well as the USA.
If anything, the dumping of nuclear waste is accelerating exponentially today, not reducing in amount, despite ‘treaties’ banning ocean dumping.


Please help AGRP get this news out… thanks for your generous and very appreciated support!
1X Donation Monthly Donation – AGRP OnlinePinterest Pics – Translate

A Green Road Eco Clothing/Products StoreShop At AGRP Amazon StoreLinkedin

More ways; support A Green Road ProjectWebsiteTwitter – Facebook Group Page

Get AGRP Delivered To Your Email Address – Smartphone AGRP AppRSS FeedIndex
A Green Road Project; Teaching the Science of Sustainable Health. Keep asking – what works for 7 future generations without causing harm? Copy and share link(s) via your social media!


History, Locations, Country Totals, Types, Amounts Of Radioactive Nuclear Waste And Reactors Dumped In Oceans And Seas

For more articles like this, click on;

Website and contact page


A Green Road Project – Science Of Sustainable Health Open Source Commons Knowledge Database
– Click in search box in upper right corner and type in search term to find any related article(s)
– Click on ‘pages’ in upper left corner to see index of all subjects

Spent Fuel Pool #4 Allegedly ‘Unloaded’ By TEPCO Dec. 2014, The Coverup Continues

Spent Fuel Pool #4 Allegedly ‘Unloaded’ By TEPCO Dec. 2014, The Coverup Continues 

Thanks to Anne on Enenews; There were 204 new fuel assemblies in SFP #4 according to Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, CNSC Fukushima Task Force Report, INFO-0824, October 2011, p. 6:

Table 2.2 shows the inventory of fuel assemblies in the spent fuel pools in units 1 to 4. Table 2.2 Spent Fuel Pool Inventories (fuel assemblies) 

Unit Fuel in reactor   Spent fuel in pool    New fuel in pool

#1    400                            292                          100

#2    548                            587                            28

#3    548                            514                            52

#4      0                            1,331                          204

TEPCO proudly announced that they had finished taking out all 22 new fuel assemblies last week and and that another 2 new fuel assemblies were removed last July. That is all well and good. We can all agree that 24 total fuel assemblies were removed from SFP #4 at Fukushima Daichi. 

We just have a teensy weensy problem here… According to the inventory above, spent fuel pool #4 should have contained 204 new fuel assemblies, not just 24.

–  24 removed by Nov. 2013
180   left to go, correct? There should still be another 180 MOX plutonium fuel assemblies in the #4 spent fuel pool, if indeed this is what the videos are showing. Maybe this is Daini we are looking at, not Daichi? Maybe this is another nuclear plant somewhere else entirely? 

TEPCO is claiming that ALL of the new fuel assemblies were removed from SPF#4. So what happened to the other 180 fresh fuel assemblies containing MOX plutonium fuel? Did terrorists steal them while no one was looking? Did the Japanese mafia that supplies all of the workers on site steal them and sell them on the black market? Did the military take them?  Are we even talking about the same spent fuel pool, or is this just another smoke and mirrors lie conjured up by the great magicians at TEPCO in the land of nuclear OZ?

These nuclear ‘experts’ are so adept at lying, deception and cover ups, who knows what is really going on? The IAEA is nothing more than a marketing arm of the nuclear agency, so they seem incapable of doing any real oversight, much less reporting about what is really going on at Fukushima or anywhere else. And WHO seems to have never even gone anywhere near the site, much less do any report on it. They are basically a lap dog of the IAEA, since signing an agreement that the marketing agency was in charge of all of this.

The regulatory agencies in Japan are seemingly useless and worthless. The Japanese government seems to just want to not spend any money on anything and pretend it all away, while doing little or nothing. They sure do not want to talk about reality. Meanwhile, we have 400 tons of highly radioactive water going into the ocean per day, with nothing being done about it. We also have 3 melted coriums under the ground. TEPCO says it does not know ‘where’ the coriums are from the three reactor melt downs. 

But let’s start with something simpler, like the TEPCO claims about Building #4. TEPCO claims that Fukushima Daichi Building #4 never blew up. They say that all of the damage in the video below for building #4 came through a pipe connecting building #3 with #4. They say this pipe caused a transfer of some of the explosive gases from #3 to create all of this damage.. What do you think?  

Does this look like a transfer of explosive gases coming from the reactor next door? There are no photographs or videos of Building #4 exploding, but that does not mean it never happened. Obviously building #4 blew up. We just have never been provided with video of the actual event. No one can dispute that Building #4 blew up; not even TEPCO.

Our thought is that if a pipe really did transfer this much explosive force, enough to blow out concrete panels and rip them from concrete reinforcing rods, while blowing off the whole roof and bulging out the concrete walls on the loading door, and cracking the wall at the base of the building where the whole building is connected to the foundation, then the pipe itself would have split open and exploded out of the ground, BEFORE that amount of instantaneous force could have reached building #4. It would help to know what kind of pipes connect the buildings. Is this ‘pipe’ made of PVC, ABS, tin, galvanized sheet metal, or something else?

Here is a picture of a major crack in the based of the south wall of Fukushima reactor 4…Posted on May 20, 2012

If the building #3 did not cause the #4 building to explode, then WHAT on Earth did that amount of damage to 8 foot thick concrete rebar reinforced walls? This huge of an explosion had to be either the reactor exploding, which was supposedly empty, or the spent fuel pool, or hydrogen gas, correct? But the problems start from there. If either one or both of them exploded like #3 did, then we have major problems with believing anything is left inside of spent fuel pool #4. 

Three Mile Island melted down and had a hydrogen explosion. That hydrogen explosion damaged almost nothing. It blew out a door, and that was about it. Here we have catastrophic damage that almost brought the whole building down, from the foundation,  basement, and all the way on up to the top floor.

Below is the evidence containing photograph that provides absolute proof that TEPCO is lying once again.. This is a satellite photo that shows Building #4 intact and will all walls are still there, while the #1 and 3 Buildings are in ruins after having exploded.. (#4 is the square building to the right). You will have to hunt very long to find a photo like this, because the web has been ‘scrubbed’ clean of all of this kind of evidence, which does not fit the fairytales that TEPCO is telling in the land beyond OZ. 

Source: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10202517200434574&set=p.10202517200434574&type=1&theater

So now we get back to discovering and ferreting out the truth. An explosion coming from either a spent fuel pool (#4 reactor is empty, remember) more than likely does not just leave all of the racks in place, neatly tied up with a bow. 

A major explosion like this would cause damage to the pool at the very least. One potential way this could have happened is via the FOIA documents which say that the pool was ’emptied’ of water due to a crack, and that all of the fuel inside melted down. 

But that story does not match up with the photograph evidence above. 

How did the dome sitting on top of the reactor move to the other side of the building? How did this 4-8 foot thick concrete wall building explode from an empty reactor, and a spent fuel pool that theoretically could not have caused this explosion by itself? 

Why is the hydrogen explosion story potentially a lie as well? And before we leave this picture, take a look at the outside walls. Look closely at the lower left hand corner, which is blown out completely, while all of the other walls are still intact. This is more evidence, correct?

Without being a demolitions expert, couldn’t the location in the lower left hand corner of the building be the source of the explosion? What was in that corner? The answer; an equipment pool. 

After Three Mile Island had a hydrogen explosion, (which did not explode the containment building), vents were added to all nuclear power plants to get rid of hydrogen gas so that this could not happen again, in any future nuclear accident. The vents were allegedly added at Fukushima as well, so that theoretically at least, no building at  Fukushima could have had any hydrogen explosions, despite reactors and spent fuel pools melting down. So if we eliminate a hydrogen explosion at #4, what is left?

How did 4-8 foot thick concrete walls get blown out all the way down to ground level? How did an 8 foot thick foundation and walls get cracked up and panels get blown out to the point where the whole building almost came down?

Now on to the next lie.. The first lie was that #4 building never really exploded. In the next lie, TEPCO claims that Spent Fuel Pool #4 never really dried out, caught on fire, and that nothing really melted down inside of it, and all of the fuel contents are still in there. This makes the official TEPCO calculations line up so that Fukushima is only 10% of Chernobyl, remember?

According to TEPCO, the building never blew up by itself, and no fires or meltdowns happened in the SFP#4 or in any of the other spent fuel pools. According to TEPCO, the fuel pools are all still there, and all of the spent fuel is still inside of SFP#4, 3, 2, and 1. The SFP in #4 is in good enough shape to take out and move all of the fuel inside of it, with a simple pulling arm. That is their claim.


Arnie Gunderson goes into great detail about how the spent fuel pools 1, 2, 3 and 4 were all damaged, contrary to what TEPCO claims.  TEPCO claims no spent fuel was damaged and all of it is in good shape, ready to pull and do whatever they want to do with it. 

What follows is a video of black smoke or steam pouring out of #4 building on 5/21/2011. 

Source; http://fukushimafaq.wikispaces.com/Fukushima+-+mysterious+bright+flashes+with+pink+and+blue+camera+pictures

Another author also goes into great detail about how multiple scientists in different locations analyzed what came out of Fukushima. Except for TEPCO and their ‘allies’, multiple scientists outside of TEPCO determined with great scientific accuracy that the spent fuel pools DID dry out and catch on fire, multiple times. For more on this, click on the following link..


Now on to another lie.. Could it be that #4 spent fuel pool dried out, caught on fire and melted through? One source has pictures to prove this and more than one source reported that #4 spent fuel pool cracked, dried out and failed completely, including the NRC, via FOIA documents. Below is the picture that seems to show that melted fuel is pouring out of the side of the #4 building..  Where did this melted fuel come from? 

Source; http://govtslaves.info/deadly-report-fukushima-4/

Another potential answer, according to Starbird, is that the “explosion in the North end of R4 wasn’t hydrogen. The FOIA docs say it occurred after a 9 hour fire! This explosion was caused by hot fuel stored in the shallow equipment pool. That fuel later poured out of the north wall of R4 as lava and be seen in the photos in this report.” http://govtslaves.info/deadly-report-fukushima-4/

This story might make more sense than anything else, because it also accounts for the missing plutonium fuel rods, which could have burned and then exploded in the shallow equipment pool, near that corner where we saw the most damage. That would also explain why so many lies were created to cover this all up. 

TEPCO does not want the world to know how dangerous plutonium fuel rods are, much less that two bundles of them exploded, (on in reactor #3, and then many more tons of it in the shallow equipment pool and burning in the spent fuel pool of #4. What do you think? 

We have now pulled apart and disproved MULTIPLE lies that TEPCO is foisting on a gullible public and a mass media press that fails to fact check even these simple facts. How many other lies is TEPCO still engaged in? Can TEPCO or the Japanese government be believed at all? Where are the investigative journalists, like 60 Minutes? The mass media is complicit in this great deception, and possibly guilty of being part of this coverup and lies.

Now we dive deeper and further into this spent fuel removal process. We have the 3rd TEPCO claim/lie around building #4. They say that all new fuel assemblies have been removed, when any 5th grader can see that this is an obvious lie. What happened to all of the missing fuel bundles? Where did they go? What happened to all of that plutonium fuel? 

What will be the next lie and coverup? The Fukushima story is much wilder than any TV prime time drama or detective story. This story should be on the nightly news, or it should be a reality TV show, where people can vote on whether what is being shown is a lie or the truth and try and figure out what the truth really is. 

Bottom line, the video at the very beginning of this article has much more possibility of being true, when we compare it to what TEPCO is claiming in their wild eyed, fairytale theories and garbage in computer models, with no actual independent third party evidence. 

If they can get an independent outside third party nuclear engineer team in there, maybe that would help. If Chris Busby goes in there and reports that the spent fuel is all there and undamaged in spent fuel pool #4, great. If that happened, that would be something to hang a hat on. 

But at this point TEPCO has lost so much credibility that one has look at everything TEPCO says, photographs or videotapes and then photoshops, with a great deal of suspicious, distrust and outright disbelief, just because they have lied so much in the past and they continue to lie even today. 

One thing we can count on, is that the truth is often, mostly or ALWAYS very far away from what TEPCO initially reports. Here is just another link to a picture showing another attempt at photoshopping building #4, and this is not the first time either…

At the very least, we have credible reports that the spent fuel now being pulled out as of Dec. 2013, is bent into a shape like a banana. Spent fuel does not get bent into the shape of a banana without great amounts of heat and melting. Isn’t it odd that they stopped talking about the fuel being removed, and no mass media press is releasing pictures of what they are pulling out? Do these assemblies even have fuel rods inside of them, or are they just pulling out empty metal containers? 

Where is the verification by outside investigative journalists not tied to the nuclear industry? Who is protecting the public interest? Who is watching out for the global village and the billions of people globally who keep breathing in the hot particles from Fukushima even to this day? 

Where is the reporting about the massive amounts of plutonium that came out of Fukushima? Where is the reporting about the underground coriums and the constant flow of high level radiation into the Pacific? Where is the reporting about the barges going into and out of the Fukushima harbor, loaded with who knows what? Where is the reporting about the ‘evaporative’ fuel ponds, and the amount of radiation released from those ‘ponds’? 

Where is the reporting about the specific levels of radiation in the dumped radioactive waste water coming directly from their water ‘filtering’ operations; at 12:16 into this next video? Then look at the huge amount of water streaming from the canal out of Fukushima at 13:35. They say that they are ‘checking’ this water before releasing it.. But who is checking the radiation levels, before they dump this into the ocean, via the green line?

In the video above, TEPCO makes the claim that no radiation is being found in the ocean outside of the plant. Who is confirming this claim, made as of Sept. 2013? A few months before this, there were stories of wildly increasing radiation levels and all of this going into the ocean, plus high levels of radiation being found in the fish and in ocean water. 

Just a few months after this out of control emergency with everything going downhill fast, all of a sudden, with no changes in anything, everything is back to normal and ‘safe’. The radiation emergency completely disappeared, fish are safe to eat, the ocean is radiation free, and everyone is happy, according to the TEPCO happy news channel. Do you believe any of this happy talk? 

Because no outside investigative media and no neutral independent nuclear engineers are allowed free reign at Fukushima, truth is NOT happening yet, amongst any of the present players in this deception and lie riddled nuclear shell game. In our estimation, the world knows about 1% of what is really going on at Fukushima Daichi and in the nuclear industry in general. 

99% of what happened or what is NOW happening at Fukushima is still hidden away, in deep dark secret closets that NO ONE is allowed to talk about. Now add in the new state secrets bill that was just passed. This state secrets bill will more than likely just shove the existing closely held secrets deeper into the closet, when what is needed is an airing out and more truth telling. 

Keep your family safe out there. It may help to invest in a good quality pancake style Geiger Counter, because as we have learned from Chernobyl, Three Mile Island, and now Fukushima, the public is the LAST to know when dangerous radiation is coming their way. The only person protecting you and your family is YOU, and quite possibly the neighbor, but only if they have a Geiger Counter and you are on good terms with them. 

Without a radiation detector, or access to a citizen radiation monitoring network, odds are you will find out nothing until months after getting dosed with high radiation levels. And if someone in government does tell you to move, it will more than likely be that they will tell you to go right into the worst part of the radiation plume, as happened with the Fukushima mega disaster. 


Spent Fuel Pool #4 Allegedly ‘Unloaded’ By TEPCO Dec. 2014, The Coverup Continues ; via @AGreenRoad

Teaching the Science Of Sustainable Health And Success. What works for 7 future generations without causing harm? To access a library full of articles, movies, books and videos, click on links below.

Website and email form contact page

A Green Road Project Magazine

– Click in search box in upper right corner and type search term to find any article
– Click on pages in upper left corner to see index of all subjects

About A Green Road Project (AGRP) Page

Watch/Learn; YouTube Channel 

Spiritual, Interfaith, Consciousness; How To Create Heaven On Earth
Holistic Living, Health, Self Healing, Environment And Renewable Energy
Inner and Outer Mysteries of Life
Peace, War, Human Rights, Justice, Prisons, And Violence Prevention
Drugs, Medicine, Medical Radiation and GMO’s 
Art And Science Of Deception; Global Corporations And The 1%, Whistleblowers, And Solutions 
Low Dose Radiation Dangers, Symptoms For Children And Adults
Effects Of Internal Low Level Nuclear Radiation


Radiation In Food/Water, Geiger Counters, Dosimeters, Radiation Readings
Animals, Insects, Birds And Plants Radiation Effects

Nuclear Bombs, Nuclear Weapons, Nuclear War

Uranium Mining and Enrichment, Nuclear Fuel Manufacturing,  Fracking

Nuclear Accidents, Recycling, Nuclear Fuel

Individual Radioactive Elements/Isotopes, USA Radiation Exposure Prevention and Reversal, Music
Nuclear Reactor Recertification, Relicense
Long Term Storage Of Nuclear Fuel, Nuclear Waste 
“Do not go where the freeway may lead – Go instead where there is no path and leave A Green Road for others to follow.”
Social Media Links
“Never give up, never.” Every person is important. Connect with AGRP and other birds of a feather.
Subscribe; YouTube Channel 
Connect; Google+ 
A Green Road is where heart and paradigm shift happens. Featuring sustainable green living news, movies, articles and videos from cutting edge minds and hearts, AGRP asks the question; what will benefit seven future generations without causing harm? AGRP teaches the Science of Sustainable Health, through articles, videos and books. 
Share the article/video titles and links by copying and pasting them into email, Facebook and Twitter. Thanks for doing your part. Keep shining your light and sharing this information with friends, co-workers, politicians, doctors, professors, and other leaders! 
What is Needed? Top Down Champions Of Sustainability With $; via @AGreenRoad
Share the online magazine article titles and links above by copying and pasting them into email, Facebook and Twitter. Or click on the share buttons below. Thanks for doing your part. Keep shining your light and sharing this information with friends, co-workers, politicians, doctors, professors, and other leaders!

The Five Stages Of Grief In Response To Trauma, Abuse, Disasters Such as Fukushima, or Loss And How To Move Through To Transcendence

There are four things you can count on in this life; change, trauma, death and taxes. People fear and resist all of these because they are not comfortable or easy. Change is resisted so much, that often death comes instead of our changing something. Feeling sad or having other feelings due to change, trauma or death is natural, but most people have no idea what to do with these feelings.


Healing from Losses and Wounds Emotional pain is not a sickness. Feeling sad, angry, guilty and afraid is mourning. It is our natural and healthy emotional response to the path through loss, discouragement, disempowerment and adversity. Emotions do not define us. They are our heart’s response to life. Emotions show us what we care about and they guarantee that we heal from our losses and losses and wounds through grieving, acceptance and growth.- Heather Carlile


Those who are interested can easily find out all about how terrible, monstrous, evil and wicked the nuclear power industry is. There is a natural reaction to finding out bad news like this, because it is a trauma or a loss of our sense of normalcy in the world. The tendency is to deny anything bad and ignore it, while stuffing feelings around it as well, because they are so uncomfortable, and most people have no idea about what to do with these feelings or how to respond to them.

Titantic and Costa Concordia – Example of Normalcy Bias In Fukushima Mega Disaster; via @AGreenRoad 
Losing a sense of normalcy and feeling that the world is heading in the wrong direction when it comes to nuclear power or nuclear weapons is normal. 
The processing of a feeling of loss or grieving over a dead past, or a ‘normal’ that cannot be gotten back, is called grieving. 
The five stages of loss and grief: 
1. Denial and Isolation (normalcy bias)
2. Anger 
3. Bargaining 
4. Depression 
5. Acceptance 


Guardian: “Zen master Thich Nhat Hanh: only love can save us from climate change
Zen master Thich Nhat Hanh, one of the world’s leading spiritual teachers, is a man at great peace even as he predicts the possible collapse of civilization within 100 years as a result of runaway climate change. Thay suggests that our search for fame, wealth, power and sexual gratification provides the perfect refuge for people to hide from the truth about the many challenges facing the world. Worse still, our addiction to material goods and a hectic lifestyle provides only a temporary plaster for gaping emotional and spiritual wounds, which only drives greater loneliness and unhappiness.
Thay, who has just celebrated the 70th anniversary of his ordination, reflects on the lack of action over the destruction of ecosystems and the rapid rate of biodiversity loss: “When they see the truth it is too late to act … but they don’t want to wake up because it may make them suffer. They cannot confront the truth. It is not that they don’t know what is going to happen. They just don’t want to think about it.” More at;


Acceptance does not mean fatalism or inaction. Acceptance means that one is fully in the present moment, knowing what was lost and acting from that point of knowledge, awareness and fearlessness.


How To Not Become A Victim Of Negative Emotions; Become A Master Of Your Emotions, Using The Science Of Sustainable Health And Success
When a person no longer lives in fear, denial, anger, bargaining or depression, one is empowered and conscious to a much greater degree. To accomplish this level of awareness and peace with what was lost may take weeks, months, years or decades. Some people never get through all of the stages of grieving in a lifetime, as they get ‘stuck’ on one stage or another whether through drugs, PTSD, or other blocks.


Some people say that it is the ‘indigo’ children coming in who will ‘save’ the planet, not the previous generations that created the mess.  It is easy to get stuck in the lizard brain and experience PTSD from the trauma of learning very bad news for example. This PTSD can debilitate a person completely, and possibly even create illness. 
There are many therapists trained to help a person move through the stages of grief and to release the PTSD memories from the lizard brain, using quick, easy, and efficient methods. These methods are known by a variety of names, but they all work by accessing the lizard brain, removing the negative memory and replacing it with a positive one.

Using drugs alone for long periods of time may not be the best answer.

The Marketing of Madness: The Truth About Psychotropic Drugs; via A Green Road

NLP is one such method..


Bottom line, it helps to seek out a grieving support group, a therapist or counselor to help move through the grief, loss, abuse or trauma. Do not try and tough it out alone or resist the process, as that will just make it stretch out longer, or completely stop the healing process.

Introduction To Non Denominational Interfaith Prayer Partnering; How It Works And Why It Is Necessary

The first step is just allowing the feeling to be. Allow the feeling space. It may help to write about it, or journal around it daily.. Give the feeling room. Allow it. Speak it. Write it. Follow the consciousness raising exercise in the video above, as if you were there.. Let your DNA speak. Follow your heart and intuition about what to do at each stage of grieving. Be kind, loving and forgiving to yourself…


“True power therefore, is in the death of the former self, thus the first stages of awakening correspond to the Kübler-Ross stages of grieving:
1.Denial: “This can’t be happening!”
2.Anger: “Why me, why do I have to do all the work?
3.Bargaining: “Just let me keep my pointless job, my car and a beer or two.”
4.Depression: “It’s hopeless, why bother with anything?”
5.Acceptance: “I know that I will be in a better place.”
After the child is “let go to Spacemind” you pass through the self-Self membrane into the higher stages:
5.Progressive Surrender: Falling into sync with the Muse and Kairos.
6.Progressive Differentiation: Pulling away from the need for social affirmation.
7.Progressive Solidification: Strengthening of identity with Spirit-in-action.
8.Progressive Rewards: Increased bliss, Presence and self-assurance.
9.Progressive Awe and Magic: Realization of goals, less obstructions in the way.
10.Progressive Unity: Nottwo/Nondual realization continuous in daily life.
All perception of lack is acknowledgement of inherent potential.


Grieving and/or depression is natural. The darkness is or can be part of awakening to what is behind the seemingly solid curtain of this physical realm. What can be waiting on the other side of grieving and depression, and beyond the portals of awakening, is the miracle of a phoenix rising from the ashes.  Awakening to who we truly are, by seeing through the illusion of this dimension also offers hope in a seemingly dark age. 
How To Not Become A Victim Of Negative Emotions; Become A Master Of Your Emotions, Using The Science Of Sustainable Health And Success
Remember that there is always a spiritual gift offered within any dark time or negative event. Certainly this age and time is filled with seemingly unsolvable problems that are way to big to handle. We do not remember who we are. We have no idea of the powers inherently built into us. We are using only .01% of our capacity, or less when operating in the ‘normal’ world that is governed by those who think that the physical world is all there is.
Thus, to ‘wake up’ due to the very depressing, full of suffering and grief filled physical world and realize that our actual reality is invisible and not physical, is actually a huge gift. But without extreme darkness, one is probably not going to seek out the light that is within. Most people would rather die than change, even if the change is positive.


Because all change is resisted by ego, intense suffering, ego transmutation, grief and/or depression may be needed. It is important to realize that it is always darkest before the dawn. There is a gift in the darkness and suffering, no matter what form it takes.
It may be of help to ask each day to be shown what the gift is, and how to transform or transmute the darkness into light. All of the answers are there, at all times. But our job is to surrender into what is planned for us, rather than trying to force something to happen. By maintaining a focus on the positive, by focusing on the gift(s), even in the middle of the darkness, it is possible to keep moving forward one step at a time, no matter how dark the physical world may seem to be.
What is the spiritual work that is mine to do this day? Ask for help, assistance, guidance and surrender your own will. Keep your focus on the heart and what feels good in the heart. Stop doing whatever does not feel good for the heart. Let the feeling of love and light within guide your daily life, and decisions for the future. The way through the darkness and into the light will be shown through  selfless service, volunteering, dreams, ideas, books, people talking with you, sacred circles, prayer, fasting, and more.. Note; this is not a complete list.


There is no end to ‘grieving’, because feeling sadness is part of the heart’s being open and vulnerable. If a person has an open heart, they are going to feel pain and suffering. The paradox is that by moving into our hearts, we actually open up to feel more pain and take on more suffering from others, thereby helping them to move through their grieving, pain and loss. The circle keeps moving around and around, in upward spirals that lead into greater love, greater compassion, greater vulnerability, more consciousness and more awareness. No one is given more than they can handle and help is always available if we are willing to ask for it and then reach out for whatever help is given both on invisible levels and in the physical world. There is no end to this positive, life affirming process, as infinity is our true home.


Humanity has a bright future ahead. It may help to keep your focus on that bright future (whether through prayer, visualization, intention, affirmations, etc), because what we focus on manifests. We are much more powerful than we believe.
Humanity Has A Bright Future And Destiny; Here Is How You Can Help Make It Happen
A Nuclear And Radiation Free World Dream – Can It Be Made Into Reality With The Power Of Love And Miracles? via @AGreenRoad
Finally, do what works for seven future generations without causing harm. Learn more about this by learning about the science of sustainable health, which is taught by AGR. 
Dr. Goodheart Teaches How To Make Stone Soup That Will Feed Seven Future Generations


Anything large will eventually fall, but that is not just a negative. The people within a large organization or structure that is falling apart or failing will create something new and even better after it is gone and dead. The large unsustainable thing will die, but the individuals within keep going on.
So if you are inside of something large that is falling and/or failing, see the positive within this. Look within yourself. Find your David within. Where is your sling? Where are your rocks? Ask yourself questions. Find the creative spark that will build something even better and more sustainable than the structure or dynamic that is unsustainable and falling apart.
Share this story with others around you. Always remember that ‘best’ David’s act and do things in ways that benefits seven future generations without causing harm to them. 
The Hidden And Unknown Story Of The Battle Between David And Goliath

There is no order of difficulty when it comes to miracles. It is just as easy to move a mountain as a mole hill when it comes to spiritual powers and miracles. But that is another story.. To find out more about this, click on the link below.. 
The Five Stages Of Grief In Response To Trauma, Abuse, Disasters Such as Fukushima, or Loss And How To Move Through To Transcendence; via @AGreenRoad 

More articles like this at;

Ancient Stories, Success, Motivation, Activism, Spiritual, Mental, Emotional, Interfaith, Consciousness, Near Death, Miracles, Healing, Auras, Reincarnation

Also see more articles at;

Index/Table Of Contents http://tinyurl.com/agrindex

China, Japan and Germany Generated More Electricity From Renewable Energy Sources; Nuclear Only 2.6% of Global Energy Supply

China, Japan and Germany Generated More Electricity From Renewable Energy Sources;  Nuclear Only 2.6% of Global Energy Supply

According to the World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2013, “China, Japan and Germany – three of the world’s four largest economies – are following this trend and generated more electricity from renewable energy sources than from nuclear in 2012.
In a sense, Germany’s energy transition has received much of its boost through the political decision to phase out nuclear power. Not only does this policy offer the best planning security for investors but it also eliminates significant barriers to innovation when it comes to other generating options and energy efficiency measures. It is a model worth considering for other countries.” 


Germany accomplished it’s green goals by building on voters putting the Green Party into a position politically, where it could influence national politics enough to make it possible for a phase out of nuclear power. 
Germany has a form of democracy that counts the votes of everyone, compared to a winner takes all approach in the US. The US suffers from the problem of both major parties being controlled in large measure by huge monopolistic carbon/nuclear corporations, in both elections and politics. 
Despite the US being behind other countries in terms of switching to green, zero carbon renewable energy production, it can still accomplish a zero carbon goal. So how can this goal of zero carbon, zero nuclear be accomplished, despite road blocks from the top down 1% control, via the carbon and nuclear monopolies? 
Top 100 Global Warming Denialist Groups Are ALL Funded By HUGE Corporations; via @AGreenRoad
In the US, on a local level, communities can easily accomplish the goal of switching to 100% zero carbon, renewable energies, including using hydrogen power as a storage medium for fuel, when other forms of renewable energy are not available.


The city of Berkeley in California voted to close down all nuclear plants in the US. If enough cities do this, it can influence state and national politics. 

The Berkeley City Council voted on a resolution to decommission California nuclear plants and to transition to green non-nuclear renewable energy generation sources. This model city resolution supports closing and decommissioning all California nuclear plants. 
The resolution also supports transitioning to green, zero carbon non-nuclear generation sources. It asks Governor Brown to call upon the California Public Utilities Commission to take action. It urges President Barack Obama and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to reverse their support of nuclear power. It asks to stop loan guarantees to the nuclear energy industry. 
The resolution asks the governor to shut down nuclear facilities operating in seismically active areas of the U.S. It asks to establish a moratorium on building new nuclear reactors and investing in clean, renewable energy. It insists that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission withhold license renewal for Diablo Canyon, plus all other nuclear plants, military, research and public reactors included, until seismic issues and safe off-site permanent storage are resolved and implemented.
See resources available online for organizing in your community and getting your community city council, or county board of supervisors to do the same thing. All change happens from the bottom up. City by city, county by county, make it happen. If not you, who? If not now, when?


According to the New York Times, coal and nuclear are both doomed, for very obvious reasons. The article points at studies that show renewable energy source can provide 80% of US energy by 2050, using CURRENT technology, while also reducing carbon emissions by 80%.


stock April 5, 2015 Zion nuclear will be bankrupt before cleanup is done
The balance in the Zion Nuclear Power Plant decommissioning trust fund was about 30% lower at the end of 2014 than it was the previous year according to a report filed by ZionSolutions with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission on March 30.
The Report on Status of Decommissioning Funding for Shutdown Reactors—due annually—indicated that there was a total of $280.2 million in the trust fund on Dec. 31, 2014. Last year’s report showed a balance of just over $400 million. These plants cost around $2B in 2014 dollars to decomm.


Help your community set a LOCAL goal of being 100% powered by zero carbon, renewable energy and zero nuclear power within 5 years. Set the vision. Set the goal. Everything else happens from there. Those with a vision are the leaders. Everyone else can follow or help to implement the vision. The vision of a self sufficient, local, job creating, clean energy, zero carbon future is a MOST powerful thing.
China, Japan and Germany Generated More Electricity From Renewable Energy Sources;  Nuclear Only 2.6% of Global Energy Supply
For more articles like this;
Holistic Living, Health, Self-Healing, Environment And Renewable Energy

USS Liberty Incident; 3 Minute Close Call Away From All Out Nuclear WWIII, LBJ Ordered Cairo To Be Nuked

The USS Liberty Incident

Damaged USS Liberty after the attack
“On June 8, 1967, under Johnson’s orders, Israeli planes bombed the American spy ship USS Liberty off of the coast of Egypt. 34 of the 294 crewman aboard were killed in the attack. If not for some ingenuity and dumb luck the ship would have been sunk and the attack would have been blamed on Russia or Egypt. It appears that the attack on the Liberty was going to be used to justify the nuclear bombing of Cairo which may have led to World War III.
The real story is that President Johnson, who was being battered in the polls over the Vietnam War and facing a general election loss and even losing the DNC primary, ordered the Israelis to bomb the USS Liberty to create a casus belli to secure a Gulf of Tonkin style resolution to explode the world into war because in America everybody loves an outraged and indignant president who will use the full force of the military at the slightest provocation, even a government planned false flag attack.
The USS Liberty, however, encompasses far more than a murderous psychopathic American president resorting to hideously evil deeds to get re-elected. In addition to ordering the total destruction of the USS Liberty and sending 294 Americans to a watery grave in the Mediterranean Sea, LBJ also ordered the nuclear bombing of Cairo, an event specifically designed to create a nuclear war by blaming the entire USS Liberty affair on Russia or Egypt. More horrifying, it’s documented that US planes were on emergency standby orders as pilots waited on the runways in their planes armed with nuclear weapons. The nuclear bombing of Cairo was called off only 3 minutes before the nuclear bomb drops.
As fate would have it, LBJ’s plan blew up in his face and the world got a reprieve from a nuclear US induced holocaust
Clearly Lyndon would stop at nothing (not even nuclear war) to ensure Israeli domination of the Middle East. If he had no qualms about nuking an innocent city certainly organizing a plot to assassinate JFK and ascend to the Presidency would not be a big stretch for LBJ.” Source; 
In a more passive mistaken identity account that does not include LBJ, Wikipedia reports that: Israel apologized for the attack, saying that the USS Liberty had been attacked in error after being mistaken for an Egyptian ship. Both the Israeli and U.S. governments conducted inquiries and issued reports that concluded the attack was a mistake due to Israeli confusion about the ship’s identity,[2] though others, including survivors of the attack, have rejected these conclusions and maintain that the attack was deliberate.[6]


20 Close Calls; Numerous Close Calls Almost Started Global Nuclear War During 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis; via @AGreenRoad

Dr. Helen Caldicott MD On Nuclear Weapons, MAD/Nuclear Armageddon; via A Green Road http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/04/dr-helen-caldicott-md-on-nuclear.html

President Eisenhower – Farewell Warning About Military Industrial Complex; via @AGreenRoad

Bobby Kennedy, ‘Evidence of Murder’ Movie – Links to John Kennedy Assassination

John F. Kennedy Jr. Plane Crash and Death; Was It Accidental Or Something Else? via @AGreenRoad

Dark Legacy; How And Why The Coverup Of John F. Kennedy Assassination Was Accomplished Via Skull And Bones Member; via @AGreenRoad

Art And Science Of Deception; Global Corporations And The 1%


Whether you believe that the attack was deliberate or ‘accidental’, it again points out how dangerous nuclear weapons, ships and subs are. All it takes is a leader who is willing to launch a false flag attack. Even an ‘accidental’ attack can trigger an all out nuclear war in just minutes, all due to a ‘mistake’.
There are those people, like LBJ, who believe that a first strike nuclear war is winnable and doable. They are willing to use a limited nuclear war to achieve whatever goal they have in mind. 

First Strike Policy And The Samson Principle; Holding The World Hostage With Nuclear, Chemical, Biological Weapons Of Mass Destruction; via @AGreenRoad

If LBJ had successfully launched a nuclear attack on Cairo, it may very well have triggered a nuclear war with Russia or some other ally of theirs that would automatically launch nuclear missiles in response. Just blowing up a nuclear ship or sub presents it’s own dangers and risks, without anything more being done. 
Nuclear weapons on board ships or subs are one risk, and the nuclear reactor powering the ship or sub is another risk. If blown up, all of this radiation goes into both the air and water, contaminating both plus wide areas far away from this initial ‘incident’. Depending on how bad the situation is, it could make a large area uninhabitable. 

Nuclear Ships And Subs Pose Huge Risk To Humanity; Could Easily Start WW III Accidentally via @AGreenRoad

How many times has the world almost gone into an all out WWIII, without anyone really knowing about it, until 50 years later, when the ‘secrets’ are finally revealed? 
USS Liberty Incident; 3 Minute Close Call Away From All Out Nuclear WWIII, LBJ Ordered Cairo To Be Nuked; via @AGreenRoad
For more articles like this; 
Nuclear Bombs, Nuclear Weapons, Nuclear War
Peace, War, Human Rights, Justice, Prisons, And Violence Prevention 

Dr. Paolo Scampa – 9 Tons Of Radiotoxic Isotopes Came Out Of Fukushima, Enough To Kill The Whole Human Race By Internal Radiation

Dr. Paolo Scampa – 9 Tons Of Radiotoxic Isotopes Came Out Of Fukushima, Enough To Kill The Whole Human Race By Internal Radiation
The greatest catastrophe in the world is NOT being reported on by the largest news media organizations, because if they did, it would spell the end of nuclear power, guaranteed. Over 9 tons of radiotoxic elements and isotopes came out of Fukushima via multiple reactor melt downs, multiple fuel pool fires and melt downs and the #3 explosion that blew MOX fuel out of this reactor.
Dr. Paolo Scampa estimated that Fukushima was effectively 28 times worse than Chernobyl, (which happened in 1986).. not counting the plutonium. This could still turn into a global life extinction event, and we will find out when the plutonium, uranium, strontium and other ‘hot’ particles that everyone breathed in have gone through their incubation period. 
Chernobyl Coverup And Denial Of 1.5 Million Casualties – Russian Academy Of Sciences; via @AGreenRoad

3 Million Children Require Treatment Because Of Chernobyl, Many Will Die Prematurely – 7 Million Total Victims – U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan; via @AGreenRoad

When the cancers and other 1,200 diseases arrive after the latency period expires, everyone will know the true extent of the Fukushima mega nuclear disaster. It took many years to figure out how many people Chernobyl radiation killed. But that killing will not stop, as it continues today and will continue on into the future for another 1 million years.

2014 – Fukushima Ocean Radiation Compared To Chernobyl and 2,400 Open Air Nuclear Bomb Tests; via @AGreenRoad

For the complete breakdown of the radioactive inventory, see the published study results below…Kevin Blanche is right.. PU is greater than GE. No matter what GE and the nuclear cabal does to cover this up, PU will win in a very dark and deadly way. Even the executives and nuclear ‘experts’ will be subject to the whims of PU. No one is 100% immune to what is coming soon. 

Radioactive Inventory Numbers

          …by Bob Nichols

(San Francisco) – Dr. Paolo Scampa, PhD, a well-known physicist in the European Union, has prepared a radioactive inventory of Fukushima Daiichi’s destroyed  nuclear power plants 500 days after the meltdown of three disemboweled, mangled reactors.
The violent extinction level event occurred March 11, 2011. The deadly meltdown and dispersion of radioactive fuel throughout the world is on-going to this day.
Because of the nature of long-lived and short-lived radioactivity, this summation of the radioactive Fukushima inventory is valid for many years. Dr. Scampa’s inventory is current as of Friday, June 29, 2012.
There are 1,946 radioactive products produced by nuclear weapons and atomic reactors according to the Oak Ridge Nuclear Weapons Lab in America.
Fifty-five are considered to be long-lived; 898 are considered to be short-lived but last more than eight days. These nine hundred fifty-three radioactive isotopes are included in this analysis.
Nine hundred ninety-three (993) radioactive isotopes are considered dangerous and undergo radioactive decay within eight days; they are not included in this analysis.
Dr Scampa’s article is available to French speakers and all who wish to review the original French here.
I am solely responsible for any and all translation errors.
FRIDAY, JUNE 29, 2012

New inventory of reactor fuels 1, 2 and 3 of Fukushima

… by Dr. Paolo Scampa, AIPRI

(European Union) – In light of the recent facts so testified of the medium rates of effective combustion (23.35 GwJ/t) and of enrichment (3.7%) of the reactors 1, 2, and 3 of Fukushima Daichi advanced by a team of Japanese nuclear physicists,  after numerous rough sketches of reduced numbers, AIPRI is finally in condition to present a realistic inventory of fission and activation products of the 257 tonnes (1) of fuel in the three eviscerated reactors at Fukushima Daiichi. (Radionuclide Release to Stagnant Water in Fukushima-1 Nuclear Power Plant. See below.)
Alas, contrary to our reductive conjectures from the past there are many more fission products and long-lasting activation products than we had all too optimistically imagined.
It is not 3.7 tonnes, but instead more than 6 tonnes of material that was subject to fission; it is no longer 2.1 tonnes, but 2.8 tonnes that have been activated into heavier radioactive elements. To our great regret, the potential content of long-lasting radiotoxicity is well above our original estimates.

The three melted reactors combined in Fukushima Daichi contained 257 tons of nuclear fuel enriched to 3.7% Uranium 235 and divided into 1,496 assemblies,  each about 172 kg.
Reactor No. 3 also housed 32 MOX assemblies, reportedly enriched to 6% or 330 kg of Pu239.
In addition, the storage pools of these reactors have at least 239 tonnes of fuel residing there for who knows how long (1,390 assemblies) and 31 tonnes of fresh fuel (180 assemblies).
At a total electrical capacity of 2,028 MWE (2), these reactors fissioning together, had a total fission of around 1.847E20 (3) atoms per second (≈ 0.0726 g) that is to say, 6.27 kg of material per day.  
The activity attained by a radioactive element in a fuel is found to be that number of fissioned atoms per second with a constant * the total product of fission of the element being considered * e(t -λ) the probability factor 1-e(t – λ) is 1 in the case of perfectly balanced elements. NB. t is the time spent in the reactor.
The day of the earthquake their fuel was consumed according to the article cited at an average of 23.35 GWd/t at a rate of 24.07 kg/t for a total of 6.186 tonnes of fuel fissioned.
The atoms of U235 only comprise a fraction of the fissioned atoms of these 6.186 tonnes. This led to the probable fission of around 3.46 tonnes of U235 (56%), 1.86 tonnes of Pu239 (30%), 0.49 tonnes of U238 (8%) and 0.37 tonnes of Pu241 (6%).
At the time of the accident, there remained around 3.14 tonnes of fission products of the 6.19 tonnes produced over the course of time.
This fuel as well harbored around another 2.84 tonnes of residual activation products (32 assemblies of Pu239 MOX fuel are not included here) over the 5.01 tonnes of activation products produced over time. At the moment of the emergency stop, about 1.1% of the fuel was comprised of activation products.
Overall, 9 tonnes of fuel was subjected to atomic fission or activation transformation occasioning a prodigious explosion of radioactivity and radiotoxicity which over time, is several times the amount needed to kill by internal contamination the whole human race.
K. Nishihara, et al., “Radionuclide release to Stagnant Water in Fukushima-1 Nuclear Power Plant,” Trans. At. Energy Soc, Japan, Vol 11 (1), pp 13 – 19, 2012 (in Japanese).

The atomic factory disemboweled and fanned out

For such a burn up of 23.35 GWd/t and such a mass as 257 tonnes of UOX the total radiological activity at shutdown is on the order of 29.14 billion Curies [Ci,]  that is 1.078E21(4) Bq of which 4.97 billion Ci (1.84E20 Bq) is released as gas.
At the shutdown the elements of less than one year half life, hold 99.33% of the radioactive activity and 65.32% of the radiotoxicity. The half-life elements of more than a year represent only 0.67% of the radioactivity but 34.68% of the radiotoxicity.
The most remarkable of the volatile elements (elements of which the boiling point is inferior to 1,500 degrees Centigrade and escape above all the first coriums). 37,921 PBq; 1 billion Ci; 18 billion potential inhaled lethal doses.
The official report of the Japanese government to the IAEA [International Atomic Energy Association] contains a hypothesis that the emanations of nuclear fuel from Fukushima Daiichi are equivalent to the ones observed at Chernobyl.
We can see by comparing the subsets of figures below that the radioactive particle emission through the air from Fukushima is not only 3.7 times higher than Chernobyl; but, more importantly, 28.3 times more radiotoxic with every breath you take.
Copyright 2012 by Bob Nichols, All Rights Reserved. Republishing allowed with all Sources and Notes included.
Sources and Notes.
“New inventory of reactor fuels 1, 2, & 3 of Fukushima,” by Dr Paolo Scampa, Jun 29, 2012, AIPRI Blog,http://aipri.blogspot.it/2012/06/nouvel-inventaire-des-combustibles-des.html  http://tinyurl.com/7j8npql
(1) “Tonnes” in the singular is defined as 1,000 kg. each and 2,200 lbs each.
(2) A single MWE is defined as One Million Watts of Electricity.
(3) The decimal equivalent of 1.847E20 is 184,700,000,000,000,000,000 atoms per second fissioned. The number is spoken as: one hundred eighty-four quintillion, seven hundred quadrillion.
(4) The decimal equivalent of 1.078E21 is 1,078,000,000,000,000,000,000 Bq. The number is spoken as: one sextillion, seventy-eight quintillion. One Curie is equal to 37 Billion Becquerels per second. One Becquerel is one atomic disintegration per second.
Dr Scampa’s first included spreadsheet from the AIPRI article. There are six total.
Spreadsheet No 1: AIPRI, Jun 2012
Fukushima Daichi
Rate of U enrichment235
tons of fuel
257 t
Nb assemblies
U235 t1496.
Pu239 (Mox enriched to 6 %)
Average Burnup GWd / t
23.35 GWd / t
kg per tonne fissioned
24.07 kg / t
Tonnes fissionnées by heart
Note. 1 GWd / t ≈ 1.0309 kg did. / T
≈ 172 kg per assembly
Spreadsheet No 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.:
Go to Dr Scampa’s original AIPRI Blog for the detailed spreadsheets Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. They are all here:http://aipri.blogspot.it/2012/06/nouvel-inventaire-des-combustibles-des.html
Or, http://tinyurl.com/7j8npql

Source; http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/07/29/fukushimas-melted-reactors-500-days-on/


Please help AGRP get this news out… thanks for your generous and very appreciated support!
1 Time Donation – AGRP Online Monthly Donation – AGRP Online

A Green Road Eco Clothing/Products StoreShop At A Green Road Amazon Store

More ways to support A Green Road ProjectAGRP WebsiteTwitterFacebook

Get AGRP Delivered To Your Email Address – Smartphone AGRP AppIndex
A Green Road Project; Teaching the Science of Sustainable Health. Keep asking – what works for 7 future generations without causing harm?

Dr. Paolo Scampa – 9 Tons Of Radiotoxic Isotopes Came Out Of Fukushima, Enough To Kill The Whole Human Race By Internal Radiation; via @AGreenRoad
More articles at

Antimatter, Antiprotons, Antielectrons, Positrons, Antineutrons and Antiproton Radiation Dangers

Antimatter, Antiprotons, Antielectrons, Positrons, Antineutrons and Antiproton Radiation Dangers
Anti matter has the opposite charge of living matter. 
According to wiki; “A classic staple of science fiction and superhero stories, anti-matter is matter composed of antiparticles, subatomic particles that have mostly exactly the same properties (mass, intrinsic angular momentum, etc) as your everyday particles, but some properties are inverted: antiprotons are negative, antielectrons (also known as positrons) have a positive charge, antineutrons and antiprotons have negative baryon numbers, etc. In some cases (photons, neutral pions) the particle is its own antiparticle.
Antiparticles do exist naturally; however, antimatter normally only exists for brief moments before coming in contact with normal matter, and it can only be formed as a product of radioactive decay, or when particles collide at very high speeds. 
When electrons encounter positrons, both particles mutually annihilate and emit gamma radiation. At high energy, they can also produce other stuff. When protons and neutrons encounter antiprotons and antineutrons, they also annihilate, resulting in a star of pions shooting out. These antiparticles ultimately decay into high-energy gamma radiation. 
The result of all this pure energy unleashed from mass is many times more powerful than nuclear fusion (relative to its mass; it’s the purest example of Einstein’s famous equation E = mc2). Antimatter is often used as either a fuel or a weapon in fiction, both cases due to its high energy potential.
How high energy? Remember that the speed of light in a vacuum (the ‘c’ in this equation) is 3.00*108 m/s. c2 is 9.00*1016 m2/s2. Converting 1 gram of matter to energy therefore produces 9.00*1013 kg*m2/s2 = 9.00*1013 N*m ~= 90 terajoules. “Little Boy”, the nuclear weapon used against Hiroshima in 1945, was built from 64 kilograms of uranium and released only 63 terajoules.
As noted on the Kinetic Weapons Are Just Better page, you have to get something of mass m whipped up to .87 c to have the same amount of energy as a matter/antimatter reaction where both the matter and antimatter that you’re annihilating have a combined mass of m.
This explosive aspect of antimatter is also often explored, usually in the form of planet-annihilating weapons of mass destruction.* Alternatively, controlled matter/anti-matter reactions could be used as a source of power: given that it does not naturally occur in useful quantities, it would be something like an ultimate battery – with massed solar or nuclear power or particle accelerators powered by Dyson solar satellite systems throughout the Milky Way producing the energy needed to synthesize large quantities of antimatter for use as fuel for Faster Than Light Travel, weapons, matter replication, or any application needing very high energy/power density.
Antimatter is currently the most expensive stuff on Earth, priced at about $62.5 trillion a gram*. Not that a gram of antimatter was ever produced — in fact, so far we don’t know how to effectively store it. Put it in any regular container and it would annihilate against its walls. No good. Powerful electromagnetic traps have been devised, but those can only store a billion antiprotons or so. That’s one millionth of a billionth of a gram. Ish. 
More than this would be difficult because all these antiprotons have negative charge, and hate being close to each other. Alternatively, we could store antihydrogen atoms which are electrically neutral, but that also makes those electromagnetic traps much more difficult to use. Still, scientists have been able to store 309 antihydrogen atoms for more than 1000 seconds. Now all we need to do is store one trillion billion (ish) times more hydrogen. No small feat..”
Given the planetary destruction capability of antimatter, AGRP strongly urges all governments around the world to avoid paying for or doing any research on planet Earth around antimatter. At the very least, antimatter is much more radioactive and dangerous than standard nuclear weapons are, and they have the capability to destroy all life on the planet already. 
Just because anti matter can be made into a weapon, it will be. Just because it can be created, it will then need to be tested, just as nuclear weapons were. When nuclear weapons were tested, they did not know for sure whether or not it would lead to a chain reaction that would burn up all of the atmosphere or lead to some other planet destroying process, but they did it anyway. The same process will be followed with an anti matter weapon. It will be tested and tried out. So the only way to prevent an ‘accidental’ destruction of the planet Earth is to NOT go down this road. 
Just because we can do something, does not mean we should just go ahead and do it. We can shoot massive over doses of heroin into someone and ‘test’ the resulting death, but why? 
If governments want to experiment with antimatter, it should be done on another planet at some future time, such as the moon, Saturn or something else very far away from Earth, because the odds are high that the scientists involved will blow themselves and the planet up in the process of testing some device or bomb.
We only have one planet. Let’s not destroy it.


Antimatter, Antiprotons, Antielectrons, Positrons, Antineutrons and Antiproton Radiation Dangers; via @AGreenroad

For more articles like this;

Nuclear Bombs, Nuclear Weapons, Nuclear War

PBS – The World’s Biggest Bomb; Soviet Union/USA – Free Full Length Movie


Beginning in the 1950s, American and Soviet scientists engaged in a dangerous race to see who could build and detonate the world’s largest bomb. In the Soviet Union, Andrei Sakharov was the architect of this bomb. 

According to the movie, Andrei turned against the use of nuclear bombs after he estimated that just the fallout from this one bomb would eventually cause the deaths of over 500,000 people. 

The largest bomb ever created and set off created a fireball that went up 40 miles into the upper atmosphere. They almost set off one twice as big, but then it would completely gone out into space, it would have been so large. As it was, the radiation mostly went up into the upper atmosphere and stayed there. Later, it came down with the rain, making it extremely radioactive. The movie tells one story of a man sleeping outside in the rain, who lost his hair from the radioactive rain, and later died of cancer. 
Andrei Sakharov
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Andrei Sakharov
Андрей Сахаров
Andrei Sakharov
Born May 21, 1921
Died December 14, 1989 (aged 68)
Residence Moscow, Soviet Union
Citizenship Soviet Union
Known for 
Notable awards 
(1953 1955 1962)
Andrei Dmitrievich Sakharov (Russian: Андре́й Дми́триевич Са́харов; May 21, 1921 – December 14, 1989) was a Soviet nuclear physicist, dissident, and human rights activist.
He became renowned as the designer of the Soviet Union’s Third Idea, a codename for Soviet development of thermonuclear weapons
Sakharov was an advocate of civil liberties and civil reforms in the Soviet Union. He was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1975. The Sakharov Prize, which is awarded annually by the European Parliament for people and organizations dedicated to human rights and freedoms, is named in his honor.[1]
Sakharov was born in Moscow on May 21, 1921. His father was Dmitri Ivanovich Sakharov, a private school physics teacher and an amateur pianist.[2] His father later taught at the Second Moscow State University.[3] Dmitri’s grandfather Ivan had been a prominent lawyer in Russia who had displayed respect for social awareness and humanitarian principles (including advocating the abolition of capital punishment) that would later influence his grandson. 
Sakharov’s mother was Yekaterina Alekseyevna Sakharova, a great-granddaughter of the prominent military commander Alexey Semenovich Sofiano (who was of Greek ancestry).[4][5] His parents and his paternal grandmother, Maria Petrovna, largely shaped Sakharov’s personality. 
Although his paternal great-grandfather had been a priest in the Russian Orthodox Church, and his pious mother did have him baptised, he was an atheist in later life.[6][7][8]However, he did believe that a non-scientific “guiding principle” governed the universe and human life.[9]
Education and career
Sakharov entered Moscow State University in 1938. Following evacuation in 1941 during the Great Patriotic War (World War II), he graduated in Aşgabat, in today’s Turkmenistan. He was then assigned laboratory work in Ulyanovsk. During this period, in 1943, he married Klavdia Alekseyevna Vikhireva, with whom he raised two daughters and a son before she died in 1969.[9] He returned to Moscow in 1945 to study at the Theoretical Department of FIAN (the Physical Institute of the Soviet Academy of Sciences). He received his Ph.D. in 1947.
Development of thermonuclear devices
After the end of World War II, Sakharov researched cosmic rays. In mid-1948 he participated in the Soviet atomic bomb project under Igor Kurchatov and Igor Tamm. The first Soviet atomic device was tested on August 29, 1949. After moving to Sarov in 1950, Sakharov played a key role in the development of the first megaton-range Soviet hydrogen bomb using a design known as Sakharov’s Third Idea in Russia and the Teller-Ulam design in the United States… A larger variation of the same design which Sakharov worked on was the 50 Megaton Tsar Bomba of October 1961, which was the most powerful nuclear device ever exploded.
Sakharov saw “striking parallels” between his fate and those of J. Robert Oppenheimer and Edward Teller in the USA. Sakharov believed that in this “tragic confrontation of two outstanding people,” both deserved respect, because “each of them was certain he had right on his side and was morally obligated to go to the end in the name of truth.”
Sakharov never felt that by creating nuclear weapons he had “known sin,” in Oppenheimer’s expression. He later wrote: “After more than forty years, we have had no third world war, and the balance of nuclear terror … may have helped to prevent one….What most troubles me now is the instability of the balance, the extreme peril of the current situation, the appalling waste of the arms race …
Each of us has a responsibility to think about this in global terms, with tolerance, trust, and candor, free from ideological dogmatism, parochial interests, or national egotism.”[12]
Research and physics
After 1965 Sakharov returned to fundamental science and began working on particle physics and cosmology.[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]
He especially tried to explain the baryon asymmetry of the universe, being the first scientist to introduce two universes called “sheets”, linked by the Big Bang. Sakharov achieved there a complete CPT symmetry since the second sheet is enantiomorph (P-symmetry), has an opposite arrow of time (T-symmetry) and is mainly populated by antimatter (C-symmetry) because of an opposite CP-violation
In this model the two universes do not interact, except via local matter accumulation whose density and pressure would become high enough to connect the two sheets through a bridge without spacetime between them, but with geodesics continuity beyond the radius limit allowing an exchange of matter. 
Sakharov called such singularities a collapse and an anticollapse, which are an alternative to the couple black hole and white hole in the wormhole theory. Sakharov also proposed the idea of induced gravity as an alternative theory of quantum gravity.
Turn to activism
From the late 1950s Sakharov had become concerned about the moral and political implications of his work. Politically active during the 1960s, Sakharov was against nuclear proliferation. Pushing for the end of atmospheric tests, he played a role in the 1963 Partial Test Ban Treaty, signed in Moscow.
The major turn in Sakharov’s political evolution came in 1967, when anti-ballistic missile defense became a key issue in US–Soviet relations. In a secret detailed letter to the Soviet leadership of July 21, 1967, Sakharov explains the need to “take the Americans at their word” and accept their proposal “for a bilateral rejection by the USA and the Soviet Union of the development of antiballistic missile defense”, because otherwise an arms race in this new technology would increase the likelihood of nuclear war. 

He also asked permission to publish his manuscript (which accompanied the letter) in a newspaper to explain the dangers posed by this kind of defense. The government ignored his letter and refused to let him initiate a public discussion of ABMs in the Soviet press.[23][24]
In May 1968 he completed an essay, “Reflections on Progress, Peaceful Coexistence, and Intellectual Freedom”, where the anti-ballistic missile defense is described as a major threat of world nuclear war. 
After this essay was circulated in samizdat and then published outside the Soviet Union (initially on July 6, 1968, in the Dutch newspaper Het Parool through intermediary of the Dutch academic and writer Karel van het Reve, followed by The New York Times[25]), Sakharov was banned from all military-related research and returned to FIAN to study fundamental theoretical physics. In 1970 he, along with Valery Chalidze and Andrei Tverdokhlebov, was one of the founders of the Committee on Human Rights in the USSR and came under increasing pressure from the government.[13] He married a fellow human rights activist, Yelena Bonner, in 1972.
In 1973 and 1974, the Soviet media campaign targeted both Andrei Sakharov and Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn. While Sakharov disagreed with Solzhenitsyn’s Slavophile vision of Russian revival, he deeply respected him for his courage. Only a few individuals in the Soviet Union dared to defend ‘traitors’ like Sakharov and Solzhenitsyn, and those who had dared were inevitably punished.[12]
Sakharov later described that “it took years” for him “to understand how much substitution, deceit, and lack of correspondence with reality there was” in the Soviet ideals. “At first I thought, despite everything that I saw with my own eyes, that the Soviet state was a breakthrough into the future, a kind of prototype for all countries”. 

Then he came, in his words, to “the theory of symmetry: all governments and regimes to a first approximation are bad, all peoples are oppressed, and all are threatened by common dangers.” After that he realized that there is not much “symmetry between a cancer cell and a normal one.

Yet our state (and corporations) is similar to a cancer cell – with its messianism and expansionism, its totalitarian suppression of dissent, the authoritarian structure of power, with a total absence of public control in the most important decisions in domestic and foreign policy, a closed society that does not inform its citizens of anything substantial, closed to the outside world, without freedom of travel or the exchange of information.”[12]
Sakharov’s ideas on social development led him to put forward the principle of human rights as a new basis of all politics. In his works he declared that “the principle ‘what is not prohibited is allowed’ should be understood literally”, defying the unwritten ideological rules imposed by the Communist ruling elite on the society in spite of the seemingly democratic USSR Constitution.
In 1973, Andrei Sakharov was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize and in 1974 was awarded the Prix mondial Cino Del Duca. He was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1975, although he was not allowed to leave the Soviet Union to collect it. His wife read his speech at the ceremony in Oslo, Norway.[26][27] TheNorwegian Nobel Committee called him “a spokesman for the conscience of mankind”.[1] In the words of the Nobel Committee’s citation: “In a convincing manner Sakharov has emphasised that Man’s inviolable rights provide the only safe foundation for genuine and enduring international cooperation.”[12]
In no way did Sakharov consider himself a prophet or the like: “I am no volunteer priest of the idea, but simply a man with an unusual fate. I am against all kinds of self-immolation (for myself and for others, including the people closest to me).” In a letter written from his exile, he cheered up a fellow physicist and human rights activist with the words: “Fortunately, the future is unpredictable and also – because of quantum effects – uncertain.” For Sakharov the indeterminacy of the future supported his belief that he could, and should, take personal responsibility for it.[12]
Internal exile
The apartment building in the Scherbinki district of Nizhny Novgorod where A.D. Sakharov lived in exile from 1980 to 1986. His apartment is now a museum.
Sakharov was arrested on January 22, 1980, following his public protests against the Soviet intervention in Afghanistan in 1979, and was sent to internal exile in the city of Gorky, now Nizhny Novgorod, a city that was off-limits to foreigners, (as an anti-war activist).
Between 1980 and 1986, Sakharov was kept under tight Soviet police surveillance. In his memoirs he mentions that their apartment in Gorky was repeatedly subjected to searches and heists. Sakharov was named the 1980 Humanist of the Year by the American Humanist Association.[28]
In May 1984, Sakharov’s wife, Yelena Bonner, was detained and Sakharov began a hunger strike, demanding permission for his wife to travel to the United States for heart surgery. He was forcibly hospitalized and force-fed. He was held in isolation for four months. In August 1984 Yelena Bonner was sentenced by a court to five years of exile in Gorky.
In April 1985, Sakharov started a new hunger strike for his wife to travel abroad for medical treatment. He again was taken to a hospital and force-fed. He remained in the hospital until October 1985 when his wife finally was allowed to travel to the United States. She had heart surgery in the United States and returned to Gorky in June 1986.
Most of Sakharov’s friends in the human rights movement failed to appreciate the motivation for his hunger strikes and blamed Bonner for his sufferings. Sakharov, meanwhile, claimed his human right to make decisions that he felt to be morally necessary for him personally.[12]
In December 1985, the European Parliament established the Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought, to be given annually for outstanding contributions to human rights.[29]

On December 19, 1986, Mikhail Gorbachev, who had initiated the policies of perestroika and glasnost, called Sakharov to tell him that he and his wife may return to Moscow.[30]
Left to right: Yelena Bonner, Sakharov and Sofiya Kalistratova, 1986.

Political leader
In 1988, Sakharov was given the International Humanist Award by the International Humanist and Ethical Union. He helped to initiate the first independent legal political organizations and became prominent in the Soviet Union’s growing political opposition. 
In March 1989, Sakharov was elected to the new parliament, the All-Union Congress of People’s Deputies and co-led the democratic opposition, the Inter-Regional Deputies Group.
Soon after 21:00 on December 14, 1989, Sakharov went to his study to take a nap before preparing an important speech he was to deliver the next day in the Congress. His wife went to wake him at 23:00 as he had requested but she found Sakharov dead on the floor. He died of a heart attack at the age of 68.[31]He was interred in the Vostryakovskoye Cemetery in Moscow.
The Sakharov Prize, established in 1988 and awarded annually by the European Parliament for people and organizations dedicated to human rights and freedoms, was named in his honor.
An Andrei Sakharov prize is also to be awarded by the American Physical Society every second year from 2006, “to recognize outstanding leadership and/or achievements of scientists in upholding human rights”.
The Andrei Sakharov Prize For Writer’s Civic Courage was established in October 1990.[32]
Andrei Sakharov Archives and Human Rights Center
The Andrei Sakharov Archives and Human Rights Center, established at Brandeis University in 1993, are now housed at Harvard University.[33] The documents from that archive were published by the Yale University Press in 2005.[34]
These documents are available online.[35] Most of documents of the archive are letters from the head of the KGB to the Central Committee about activities of Soviet dissidents and recommendations about the interpretation in newspapers. 

The letters cover the period from 1968 to 1991 (Brezhnev stagnation). The documents characterize not only the Sakharov’s activity, but that of other dissidents, as well as that of highest-position apparatchiks, and the KGB. No Russian equivalent of the KGB archive is available.

PBS – The World’s Biggest Bomb; Soviet Union/USA – Free Full Length Movie; via @AGreenRoad

For more articles and videos like this one;

Nuclear Bombs, Nuclear Weapons, Nuclear War

Licensed to Kill – How Nuclear Reactor Cooling Towers Kill All Kinds Of Animals And Harm Ecosystem

According to NIRS; “Marine life in all forms, from endangered manatees and sea turtles to essential microscopic organisms, is being harmed and killed by once-through cooling systems, used to remove waste heat at nuclear power stations. 
A typical once-through cooling system draws into each reactor unit more than a BILLION gallons of water a day, or 500,000 gallons a minute. After cycling through the power generating station, the heated water is discharged at temperatures up to 25 degrees F hotter than the water into which it flows. 

A total of 59 out of the 103 U.S. reactor units rely on this system, either exclusively or in conjunction with closed cycle canals or cooling towers. This report examines the toll the once-through cooling intake and discharge system takes on marine biodiversity around nuclear plants, including sea turtles and other endangered marine animals. 
The report takes into account the already severe problems affecting the health of U.S. oceans and waterways and the impacts of nuclear power plant operation within the context of this crisis. The authors review the cumulative impact of marine ecosystem destruction by coastal nuclear reactors as well as the local effect on marine life in the vicinity of the plant. 
Particular attention is given to the effectiveness of regulatory oversight and the adherence to and implementation of the federal Clean Water Act (CWA), the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA).”…. 
Full report is available by clicking link; 
But the harm caused to animals from ‘once through’ cooling methods is only the beginning. Animals are harmed all the way through the nuclear fuel cycle, from the uranium mines, to the low level radiation emissions from processing facilities to the effects of low level radiation coming from all normally operating nuclear power plants. Then we have the nuclear accidents, hundreds of them…
Animals and Low Level Radiation Effects
What happens to the animals, also happens to insects, fish, plants, sea life, and finally humans in the end. Animals such as birds act like canaries in the coal mines. They warn us of impending disaster. Many stories have been coming out lately about mass die offs of starfish, herring, salmon, seals and more. Many other animals are showing signs of severe health problems such as polar bears, walruses, turtles, whales, and more. 
Human have treated the Earth like a toxic waste dump since the beginning of the Industrial and Atomic Age. When confronted with the desire to clean up the environment, huge multinational corporations just moved their base of operations for toxic plants to countries that did not demand clean operations. Thus Communist China now ranks as one of the worst polluted places on the planet, just as one example of many. The standard answer from the nuclear industry is that dilution will take care of any emissions, but they fail to address, study or measure the bio concentration of ‘diluted’ man made radioactive elements back up the food chain to humans, particularly in the most vulnerable; babies, fetuses and children. 
The nuclear industry is slow to respond to the calls for a clean and green world. It resists change and claims that all radiation is harmless or good for both humans and animals, when the studies show the opposite. People in local communities can make a difference. In one such victory linked to below, the state of New York ordered a nuclear plant to retrofit it’s cooling towers because the nuclear plant was too destructive to the river ecosystem. 
Journal Entry by admin on April 3, 2010
In a huge victory for environmentalists, the State of New York has ordered the Indian Point nuclear power plant to retrofit cooling towers or shut down because the present “once-through” cooling system is too destructive to the Hudson River ecosystem.  
Licensed to Kill – How Nuclear Reactor Cooling Towers Kill All Kinds Of Animals And Harm Ecosystem; via @AGreenRoad
More articles and videos at;
A Green Road Project – Detailing The Science Of Sustainable Health and Success. What benefits seven future generations, and causes no harm? 

Access 1,800 + videos plus articles by clicking on the Pages link in left upper corner, or type in your search words in search box at top right side corner, at;

Spiritual, Interfaith, Consciousness; How To Create Heaven On Earth
Or http://tinyurl.com/agrspirit

Drugs, Medicine and GMO’s

Or http://tinyurl.com/agrdrugs

12 Reasons Why All Carbon/Nuclear Power Plants, Nuclear Weapons Should Be Dismantled

Individual Radioactive Elements/Isotopes, USA Radiation Exposure Prevention and Reversal, Music

Or http://tinyurl.com/agriso

Uranium Mining and Enrichment – Nuclear Bomb -Nuclear Fuel Manufacturing

Or http://tinyurl.com/agrmine

Share the online magazine titles and links above by copying and pasting them into email, Facebook and Twitter, or click on the share buttons below each article/video. Thanks for doing your part. Keep shining your light and sharing this information with friends, co-workers, politicians, doctors, professors, and other leaders! 

As the Dalai Lama says; “Never give up, never.” Every person is important.

Read A Green Road Project, with up to 8,000 daily page views 


Follow A Green Road Project on Twitter 50,000 + followers https://twitter.com/agreenroad

‘Join’ A Green Road Project Facebook Group, and add your friends too! http://www.facebook.com/groups/agreenroad/

A Green Road Project YouTube Channel playlist of 700 videos in many categories at;
Or type in “A Green Road” in the http://www.Youtube.com search box to see videos available. You will be able to browse one of the largest selections of creative commons licensed videos available on Youtube.

LinkedIn Professionals Network A Green Road Project

Vote For A Green Road Project – help make this a popular website http://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/www.agreenroadblog.com

Join A Green Road Discussion Group 45,000 + members http://www.care2.com/c2c/group/agreenroad

Add A Green Road Project RSS News Feed to your website, blog or news service


What is your score? AGreenRoad Project has a Klout score of 50+ http://klout.com/#/AGreenRoad

Network on MerchantCircle http://member.merchantcircle.com/agreenroad

Read A Green Road Project Feed Burner Syndication FeedBurner makes it easy to receive content updates in My Yahoo!, Newsgator, Bloglines, and other news readers

A Green Road Project Events; http://www.eventbrite.com/myprofile/?oid=4777791053.

Multiple Fukushima Spent Fuel Pools Burned And Vaporized, Plutonium MOX Fuel Vaporized And Traveled All Around The World On Jet Stream

Multiple Fukushima Spent Fuel Pools Burned And Vaporized, Plutonium MOX Fuel Vaporized And Traveled All Around The World On Jet Stream


Pro nuclear apologists claim Fukushima  is only 1 – 10% of Chernobyl total radiation released with at least three or more complete nuclear reactor melt downs and at least two melt outs. They claim that no plutonium was released. They claim that no MOX fuel explosion happened at building #3. They claim that no spent fuel pools burned our melted out. They have to hold onto this fairy tale, because if ANY of these things did happen, the amount of radiation released increases by orders of magnitude.

A good example of a proponent of this fairy tale being debunked is available via the following article…

Dr. Wade Allison, Emeritus Professor of Physics at Oxford University Promotes Hormesis Theory

Ann Coulter Says More Radiation Is Good For You Via Fox News, As Part Of Mass Media And Nuclear Industry Promoting Quack Hormesis Theory


Via CodeShutdown April 14, 2015  see, the World Nuclear Association says right here…updated 2014 so they have had plenty of time to correct the original mistakes…we can take this as gospel;
1) after two weeks all reactors were stable
2) there have been no deaths and there would be no psychologically related deaths if the people had been allowed to return home to the evacuation zone
3) Unit 4 was somewhat damaged from a hydrogen explosion. After Unit 3 blew up, unit four then sucked in (remaining? hydrogen from U3 by a poorly understood backflow mechanism which ignited 19 hours later
4) almost all of the 15 Pbq of cesium137 came from unit 2, very little from unit 1 and almost nothing from unit 3
5) Releases to the ocean over 26 March to 30 September were about 11 PBq iodine-13, 3.5 PBq Cs-134, 3.6 PBq Cs-137, total 18.1 PBq”
World Nuclear Association
Do you believe this fairy tale? If yes, then you have more than likely been watching lots of mass media, corporate friendly news, which relays only this kind of information and nothing else.  Of course, that is another subject which you can dive into. Why is only pro nuclear information provided on mass media? 

Censored, Top Secret! Art And Science Of Deception; Global Corporations, CIA, Journalism And The 1%, Whistleblowers, Voting, Elections And Solutions

Let’s debunk the pro nuclear ‘experts’ one step at a time, so that even people who never took a course in physics or nuclear engineering can understand what happened at Fukushima, and why the ‘official’ story is such a fairy tale, that it is beyond belief.



Let’s find out if it is even possible for a spent fuel pool to burn to start with, because some of these same pro nuclear apologists also like to claim it is impossible for fuel rods to burn, as they are made out of metal. 
Everyone knows metal cannot burn, right? 


In the video above, Arnie Gunderson, a nuclear spent fuel pool expert who made his living in this arena and who is an expert on fuel rods and spent fuel pools, discusses and explores if it is possible for spent fuel pools to catch on fire.  Arnie is an expert on fuel rods, and has intimate knowledge about this, because that is what he did for many years inside the industry.
Bottom line, a spent fuel pool contains very hot spent fuel, which can and does burn, if the water is boiled away and cooling systems are lost, as was the case at Fukushima Daichi, after 3/11.

Spent Fuel Pool Risks At Nuclear Power Plants and Dry Cask High Burnup Plutonium Fuel Storage Problems; via @AGreenRoad


Are there any pictures of burning fuel rods at nuclear reactors? The answer is yes..

The above picture is a scene from a helicopter flying over Chernobyl, showing burning spent fuel rods, melting down into corium. This is proof that corium does burn and melt down into corium. 


Not many of these experts even know that both uranium and plutonium will burn if they are exposed to air, under certain conditions. 

Uranium Is Pyrophoric And Burns On Contact With Air; Used In World War II as Tracer Ammunition

Plutonium – Several Compounds Of This Toxic, Radioactive Heavy Metal Are Pyrophoric And Burn When Exposed To Air; via @AGreenRoad


For a deeper explanation of how and why corium forms when a nuclear reactor melts down, click here.. 

At Fukushima Daichi, 3 Or More Coriums Melted Out Of Containment Into Ground, Compared To 1 At Chernobyl – China Syndrome

Fukushima Coriums Melted Through The Concrete Base Mat Under Multiple Nuclear Reactors In 18 Hours, According To NRC Study – China Syndrome


Chernobyl Coverup And Denial Of 1.5 Million Casualties – Russian Academy Of Sciences; via @AGreenRoad

Most nuclear reactor melt downs have been completely covered up, by the nuclear industry and mass media. 
Nuclear Power Plant Threats, Accidents, Recycling Nuclear Fuel, Movie Reviews, Next Generation Nuclear Plants, Terrorists


TMI – Three Mile Island Nuclear Plant Meltdown And Radiation Release Coverup Exposed – 1 Billion Curies Released Near Harrisburg Pennsylvania

The above picture shows melted fuel rods at TMI. These rods also melted down into corium at the bottom of the reactor. How do nuclear fuel rods inside of a reactor or spent fuel pool melt down into corium?

Via gottagetoffthegrid February 25, 2012 interview with Robert Kelley, an engineer in Vienna who used to lead the Nuclear Emergency Response at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico.
As water evaporates and exposes the fuel, the uranium in the rods can burn through a protective sheath emitting heat and radioactive cesium. After that, the uranium may mix with any remaining water to start an uncontrolled nuclear reaction that sends radiation into the atmosphere, scientists said. “Dissolving uranium in water is the way to make a certain kind of nuclear reactor,” Kelley said in an e-mailed response to questions. “In this uncontrolled situation, the ‘reactor’ will have no human control and begin fissioning.”
In other words, any nuclear reactor or attached spent fuel pool can release massive amounts of radiation without anything burning at all, just by the water level going down far enough for the fuel rods to melt through the zirconium casing, which allows them to emit a plume of radioactive cesium and other noble gases. Then the melted uranium and/or plutonium from MOX fuel mixes with water and starts fissioning under water, releasing more radiation that way. 
Once the fuel rods melt, they collect into a 100 ton molten corium at the bottom of the reactor or spent fuel pool, such as the one shown in this article;

Inside Of Fukushima Reactor 2; Molten Corium Visible, Gamma Radiation Speckles Show Up On Camera


Next, is there any scientific evidence to prove that ANY spent fuel pools burned and/or released radition? The answer is yes, there is plenty of evidence, but ONLY if you go outside of TEPCO’s figures, which have been proven to be highly unreliable and subject to severe changes, numerous times. TEPCO seems to have a special way of measuring and reporting things, and then changing all of their figures later on down the road, due to ‘mistakes’.
“All Cs-136 measurements besides Tepco’s indicate a significant cesium release from the spent fuel pools. Since the assumptions were conservative, a range of 33%-60% of the cesium was observed to come from the pools, depending on the location of measurement.”
Is there any other proof that the spent fuel pools caught on fire? Yes, the NRC was communicating with people on site at Fukushima during the disaster and this is the summarized transcript that was obtained via FOIA process by Hatrickpenry; 
3/18/11: “The source term provided to NARAC was: 
(1) 25% of the total fuel in unit 2 (SFP) released to the atmosphere, 
(2) 50% of the total spent fuel from unit 3 (SFP) was released to the atmosphere, and 
(3) 100% of the total spent fuel was released to the atmosphere from unit 4 (SFP).” 
The amounts estimated to have burned in each spent fuel pool may be wrong, but that does not matter much. What has been documented so far via two different credible sources, is that multiple spent fuel pools BURNED and melted down.

Now let’s go into each spent fuel pool and see what evidence there is of a fire and/or explosion at each building. Remember that there are at least two pools in each building, and both can and do contain spent fuel rods; the equipment pool, and the spent fuel pool. As you will see, this is a very important detail, because either or both can catch on fire and/or melt out.

Bottom line, there can be THREE fires, explosions and/or a melt outs at each building, because each building has both an equipment pool and a spent fuel pool, in addition to the nuclear reactor.


Tepco released photos of Reactor 1 / Fuel handling machine barely hung just above SFP. Right hand side shows heat in the SFP


3/18/11: “The source term provided to NARAC was: 
(1) 25% of the total fuel in unit 2 (SFP) released to the atmosphere, 


….explosions and fires have occurred at spent fuel pools two and four over the past four days and now radiation levels are spiking enormously. In plant #2 over 30,000 spent fuel rods are now exposed, and in the #4 plant, the workers have evacuated. There is now mass panic at all airports, shopping centers to stock up on food, We are being told to stay indoors,,schools are being instructed to keep the students inside. I’ll keep you up-dated through-out the day. This is an historical event underway as we speak.

TEPCO denies any explosions or fires happened at building #2 and they claim nothing happened at the spent fuel pool in building #2, despite this building being the WORST as far as radiation release during the accident. They have no explanation for this radiation release, and just shrug their shoulders when asked to explain it. Of course, they have to stick with this story to make the 10% of Chernobyl fairy tale work at all.

Remember that there can be THREE fires, explosions and/or a melt outs at each building, because each building has both an equipment pool and a spent fuel pool, in addition to the nuclear reactor. 


3/18/11: “The source term provided to NARAC was: 
(2) 50% of the total spent fuel from unit 3 (SFP) was released to the atmosphere, and 
Fukushima reactor #3 and #4 were burning and loaded with MOX plutonium fuel. Building #3 exploded and released most of it’s contents to the air and surrounding 2 to 3 miles of countryside in the form of fuel fragments, much like Chernobyl did.

via anne October 22, 2013 UN Agency: Reactor 3 exploded a second time 24 hours later — Then wind and rain brought high levels of radiation over Tokyo, Sendai, Nagano
Because there is no independent nuclear regulator that does REAL post accident analysis, one has to guess whether these two explosions were from the reactor, the spent fuel pool or the equipment pool.

Some pro nuclear apologists like to claim that there was no MOX fuel at Fukushima anywhere.

“Worst News: Unit 4 SFP contains a full load of MOX fuel, with much plutonium.

At least two spent fuel pools at the Fukushima plant have caught fire and are releasing radiation into the atmosphere. These pools are on the upper floor of these Mark I boiling-water reactors and are now open to the air following explosions that breached the buildings around them. The U.S. has 31 boiling-water reactors with similarly situated spent fuel pools that are far more densely packed than those at Fukushima and hence could pose far higher risks if damaged. The U.S. should act quickly to remove spent fuel from these pools and place them in dry storage casks to reduce the heat load and radioactive inventories of the pools.” Edwin Lyman’s testimony to the US Senate
The Fukushima explosion at #3 all by itself is much worse than Chernobyl for 2 reasons. First, #3 contained ‘old’ fuel, which is much more radioactive than fresh uranium coming direct from a processing facility where they make these fuel rods. 
Chernobyl had fresh new fuel loaded inside of it. Chernobyl had no MOX fuel, and thus no plutonium to speak of. Unit #3 was stuffed with MOX plutonium containing fuel, and the fuel rods were ‘old’, which makes the #3 explosion orders of magnitude more dangerous, toxic and radioactive all by itself when compared to Chernbyl. Then we have to add all of the other reactors and spent fuel pool leaks, fires and explosions and add all of those to #3.


Building #3 combined with the plutonium coming from other reactors and SFP’s, blew out between 600-6000 pounds of plutonium (possibly MUCH more) into the air, which then went all around the world. Some people say plutonium is too heavy to do that. Unit #3, or whatever is left of it, is still steaming and releasing whatever was inside of it to the air, even today..

“The debris tracks on the #3 building turbine bld roof clearly show two explosions.  The first explosion was on 3/14 at 11:01, and there was a second explosion at R3 on 3/15 at 11:00. News reports also prove that there were two separate explosions on two separate days.
ViaStarbird December 28, 2013 If you look closely at the overhead photo of Reactor #3, in the following link; http://cryptome.org/eyeball/daiichi-npp/daiichi-photos.htm
In the – 4th photo down – you can see the locations of the TWO explosions.
1. The spent fuel pool was explosion #1 on 3/14/2011
2. The equipment pool was explosion #2 on 3/15/2011

For more details and pictures of the spent fuel pool melt outs and/or explosions via the spent fuel pools, click on the following link;

Another Lie By TEPCO; Not 1 Hydrogen Explosion, But 2 Separate PLUTONIUM MOX Fuel Explosions At Fukushima Building#3; via @AGreenRoad

Remember that there can be THREE fires, explosions and/or a melt outs at each building, because each building has both an equipment pool and a spent fuel pool, in addition to the nuclear reactor.

More in depth information about building #3 and it’s spent fuel pool is available here….

What Really Happened At Fukushima Reactor And Spent Fuel Pool #3? via @Green Road



The undisputable evidence above shows melted fuel inside both the spent fuel pool, the equipment pool, and the reactor.  A huge explosion happened at building #4, a huge fire raged for many hours, and a huge amount of what looked like corium oozed out of the side of the building, with a color that changed from gold to black.

3/18/11: “The source term provided to NARAC was: 
(1) 25% of the total fuel in unit 2 (SFP) released to the atmosphere, 
(2) 50% of the total spent fuel from unit 3 (SFP) was released to the atmosphere, and 
(3) 100% of the total spent fuel was released to the atmosphere from unit 4 (SFP).” 

3 recent studies report multiple fires at Fukushima Unit 4 — “Occurred in spent fuel cooling pool”

Fuel pool reactor 4; see the red circle, it looks like the nuclear fuel has melted in that spot. These fuel racks hold 60 fuel assemblies.

Each spent fuel pool contains many times more fuel than any reactor does, because that is the only place where this highly radioactive garbage can be stored for now. Never before have multiple spent fuel pools burned. Never before has a spent fuel pool melted out completely as it did at Fukushima Daichi. 

AGreenRoad – TEPCO/Fukushima Lies Exposed Around Building #4, SFP, Core. Equipment Pool, Melt Out; via @AGreenRoad

Spent Fuel Pool #4 Allegedly Being ‘Unloaded’ By TEPCO Nov. 2013, The Coverup Continues; via @AGreenRoad

Again, some pro nuclear apologists like to claim that Fukushima had no MOX fuel anywhere on site. 
“See the photo of SFP4, with the rack of MOX fuel on the lower left….MOX fuel assemblies have a unique handle on top, different from uranium fuel visible in other racks….


Not only did building #4 have numerous fires, it also had numerous explosions….
via anne October 21, 2013 On 8/30/2013, The Japanese Nuclear Regulation Authority released their report about reactor4 investigation conducted from this July to August. “In this report, they concluded reactor4 experienced at least 2 strong explosions in 311. “According to their report, the ceiling and floor of S-W part of the 4th floor had a severe damage. Also, the floor of N-W part of the 3rd floor had a serious damage. The investigating team assumed there were 2 major explosion around these areas. “In addition to it, the 5th floor lost the walls on theS, E and W and the roof. There might have been another explosion there according to their report….”
As these spent fuel pools burned and/or exploded after the earthquake and tsunami hit and destroyed the Fukushima nuclear power plant complex, the solid, highly radioactive fuel (trash) vaporized into gas and smoke (nano particles) which was then blown downwind. 
Each spent fuel pool contained between 100 to 1,000 TONS of plutonium. How much of this plutonium was released in total? TEPCO won’t even admit that ANY plutonium was on site, much less that any was released, so good luck getting this information from them. The IAEA is just a marketing arm of the nuclear industry, funded by them, so good luck with getting anything from them either. They have zero interest in reporting on anything negative. Their job seems to be to provide a good report that minimizes everything and tell the world that TEPCO is doing a ‘good job’, while encouraging TEPCO to dump the contents of all of those tanks into the Pacific.  
Remember that there can be THREE fires, explosions and/or a melt outs at each building, because each building has both an equipment pool and a spent fuel pool, in addition to the nuclear reactor. 


Due to the massive coverup and denial of anything bad happening at Fukushima and the completely ridiculous fairy tale about what happened by TEPCO that it was only 10% of Chernobyl, attention needs to be placed on what REALLY happened at the spent fuel pools in buildings #5 and #6. There is evidence of a meltdown situation happening in those buildings as well, documented at the following link..
Because there is no independent investigator of accidents, it is only possible to guess at what happened inside the reactors and spent fuel pools of these buildings, but based on the limited information, it is possible to surmise that something in at least one, possibly both of these buildings also had something melt down, either in the reactors and/or possibly in the spent fuel pools. Because of the massive coverup by TEPCO and the nuclear industry, we may never know.


What are the odds that this spent fuel pool escaped this mega nuclear disaster without any damage, fire or melt down? 
A lot depends on how ‘old’ the spent fuel was inside the pool. Spent fuel cools off as it ages inside of a spent fuel pool. It could be that if only 5 year old spent fuel (or older) was put into the common spent fuel pool, that it did not boil off the water, because the spent fuel pool rods were old and cooled off enough that this spent fuel pool survived with just passive cooling of the water inside of it sitting there. 
Most spent fuel pools need ACTIVE cooling and chemicals to keep them from melting down and forming corium. This is why the Carrington Event is such a huge threat to all nuclear plants globally. 

Super Solar Storm To Hit Earth – ‘Carrington Effect’; 400 Nuke Plants Will Melt Down/Explode, Lawsuits Needed; via @AGreenRoad


In the material above, documentation was provided, proving that MOX fuel was being used at Fukushima in multiple reactors and that it was also in the spent fuel pools. Since those same reactors and fuel pools burned, exploded and melted down, plutonium was released. The only question is; how much plutonium was released?
Plutonium was measured in plants and animals in Alaska by a Dept. Of Energy study in 2013, and it was found in air filters in Lithuania, 8000 miles away. 

There have been multiple confirmations that radiation from Fukushima traveled all around the world..

Plutonium nano sized hot particles from Fukushima went all the way around the world, multiple times. The only question left is how much, and how much was breathed in by everyone on the planet.

How Dangerous Is 400-6000 Pounds Of Plutonium Nano Particle Dust Liberated By Fukushima? Via @AGreenRoad
According to Arnie Gunderson, the average Japanese citizen breathed in about 100 ‘hot’ particles per day from Fukushima after the mega disaster. People in the US breathed in about 5 to 10 hot particles per day in the same period, but a few days after 3/11. The jet stream brought over the noble radioactive gases such as Xenon, Krypton, and nano hot particles such as plutonium, uranium, and cesium inside of buckyballs. 
2014 – Fukushima Hot Particle (Fuel Flea) Found 300 Miles Away in Tokyo, Measured At 40 Quintillion Bq/kg


Fukushima Nano Bucky Ball Hot Particles Filled With Uranium, Plutonium, And Cesium, Traveled Via Jet Stream All Over The World

The immediate effect from Fukushima was an increased number of infant deaths, which took the form of an increase in the number of child deaths during childbirth. This happened all around the world, as newborns and fetuses are up to 2,000 to 2 million times more sensitive to radiation than healthy adults, depending on which source of information you use and what age the fertilized egg or fetus is.

14,000 US Infant Mortality/Deaths From Fukushima Nuclear Disaster – Peer Reviewed Study; via @AGreenRoad


Up to a third of newborns in the US had thyroid problems at birth, thanks to Fukushima radioactive Iodine gas that traveled all around the world. The infant mortality or death rate at childbirth went up 20-30% in the days and months after the mega disaster, not just in the US, but all around the world.
USA Radioactive Iodine 131, 129 Found In 13 Cities, US Milk – Questions, Answers, FAQ’s, Facts, Potassium Iodide KI Tablets Information, Medical Use
Fukushima and the nuclear industry are responsible for the deaths of many hundreds of thousands of infants and fetuses all around the world, because in the above video, we are only counting one small area of increased deaths of infants; newborns. Death rates of infants during childbirth right after Fukushima went up all around the world… Count that up and calculate how many murders that totals.
Infant mortality Up To 40% Higher Than National Rate Around Brown’s Ferry Nuclear Plant, 48% Higher After Fukushima In Philadelphia; via @AGreenRoad 
Of course, the pro nuclear apologists claim that no one died, and no one will ever die due to Fukushima.
Plutonium is so deadly, that just one pound distributed equally in the air all around the world, can theoretically kill everyone, according to Helen Caldicott MD. Fukushima released TONS of plutonium into the air, if we add up what came out of #3, and then add in what came out of all of the spent fuel pools which contained MUCH more plutonium than any given reactor did.  What effect will this have on the living web of life? 

Dr. Busby; 40 – 60 MILLION Downwinder Deaths Due To Global Open Air Nuclear Weapons Testing Fallout 1945 to 2003

How many deaths will the nuclear industry be responsible for, as plutonium was breathed in by billions of people, initiating whatever disease, genetic mutation or cancer down the road? The answer is blowing in the wind, and we will find out, as the incubation period runs its course and the plutonium initiates and develops whatever it does. But do not be surprised if healthy, non smoking, non drinking people all around you start developing health issues and cancers all over the world in the next ten years or so. 

Sacrifice Zones, Nuclear Power and the Sacrificial Victims System Is Spreading Globally As Part Of Predatory Capitalism


The experts above discuss the various dangers posed by spent fuel pools even if nothing happens to them, and there is no nuclear accident. If you have the time, it is worth listening to and watching. 
Bottom line, even if the numbers of how much spent fuel was burned out of the various spent fuel pools at Fukushima are off, (#4 figures may be inaccurate) the fact that some plutonium was released by multiple Fukushima reactors plus multiple spent fuel pools,  should spell the END of nuclear power globally, right NOW.

Spent Fuel Pool Risks At Nuclear Power Plants and Dry Cask High Burnup Plutonium Fuel Storage Problems; via @AGreenRoad
There is no excuse for Fukushima causing the deaths of millions, and potentially billions of people…. NONE. We could call what they are doing global genocide and be perfectly justified, wouldn’t you agree? 
Nuclear power should be labeled a crime against humanity by the UN. Just like the Nazis and their genocide of Jews, there should be convictions of those responsible for building, designing and allowing plutonium to be used in any nuclear reactor. Sadly, the future plans for all nuclear reactors include using pure plutonium as fuel, rather than uranium. 
Remember that plutonium is up to 2 million times more dangerous, toxic and deadly than other radioactive elements that humans are used to. Why? Plutonium is a man made radioactive element and it mimics iron in the body. Much like the American Indians, humans have no defense or immune system ‘memory’ against plutonium. The result may very well be that just like the Indians who were wiped out by diseases brought in by the settlers, humanity will see the same thing happen on a global scale, just due to the plutonium released by Fukushima.. 
Did you give them permission to do this? Do you trust the nuclear industry? If not, speak out. Take action. Make a difference. 


Please help AGRP get this news out… thanks for your generous and very appreciated support!
1X Donation Monthly Donation – AGRP OnlinePinterest Pics – Translate

A Green Road Eco Clothing/Products StoreShop At AGRP Amazon StoreLinkedin

More ways; support A Green Road ProjectWebsiteTwitter – Facebook Group Page

Get AGRP Delivered To Your Email Address – Smartphone AGRP AppRSS FeedIndex
A Green Road Project; Teaching the Science of Sustainable Health. Keep asking – what works for 7 future generations without causing harm? Copy and share link(s) via your social media!

Multiple Fukushima Spent Fuel Pools Burned And Vaporized, Plutonium MOX Fuel Vaporized And Traveled All Around The World On Jet Stream

Website and contact page


A Green Road Project – Science Of Sustainable Health Open Source Commons Knowledge Database
– Click in search box in upper right corner and type in search term to find any related article(s)
– Click on ‘pages’ in upper left corner to see index of all subjects

%d bloggers like this: