T.A.T.A.L. – Toxic At The Atomic Level; Man Made Heavy Metal Radioactive Poisons Can Be Detected And Measured Inside All Life Forms On Planet Earth; Plants, Animals, Insects, And Humans
Thanks go to Nick at Enenews for coming up with the term TATAL (toxic at the atomic level), as it relates to the invisible heavy metal poisons pouring out of Fukushima in a never ending river of death, starting in 3/11, and continuing until present day. Of course, if all you have watched or listened to since 3/11 is the mass media, you have missed this news, because along with a bunch of other stories, they ignore and deny things like this, because it might hurt their major advertisers and/or make them look bad.
Steven Starr is the Director of the Clinical Laboratory Science Program at the University of Missouri and is an Associate member of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation and has been published by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. His writings appear on the websites of PSR, the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology Center for Arms Control, Energy and Environmental Studies, Scientists for Global Responsibility, and the International Network of Scientists Against Proliferation. Since 2007, he has worked with the governments of Switzerland, Chile, and New Zealand, in support of their efforts at the United Nations to eliminate thousands of high-alert, launch-ready nuclear weapons.
Mr. Starr is also an expert on the environmental consequences of nuclear war, and in 2011, he made an address to the U.N. General Assembly describing the dangers that nuclear weapons and nuclear war poses to all nations and peoples.
The Commons Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee chairman Anne McIntosh described the scale of the contamination in the food chain as “breathtaking” and warned that restoring consumer confidence would take time and money.
The Government has a role to secure the correct balance between affordable food prices and effective regulations that require transparency and quality.
The consumer cannot be left to face a Catch 22 where they can either pay for food that complies with the highest standards of traceability, labelling and testing or accept that they cannot trust the provenance and composition of the foods they eat…….So thats all right then? http://www.itv.com/news/topic/food-st…
BLUEFIN TUNA. A RECENT ARTICLE: Every bluefin tuna tested in the waters off California has shown to be contaminated with radiation that originated in Fukushima. Every single one.
Over a year ago, in May of 2012, the Wall Street Journal reported on a Stanford University study. Daniel Madigan, a marine ecologist who led the study, was quoted as saying, “The tuna packaged it up (the radiation) and brought it across the world’s largest ocean. We were definitely surprised to see it at all and even more surprised to see it in every one we measured.”
Another member of the study group, Marine biologist Nicholas Fisher at Stony Brook University in New York State reported, “We found that absolutely every one of them had comparable concentrations of cesium 134 and cesium 137.”
That was over a year ago. The fish that were tested had relatively little exposure to the radioactive waste being dumped into the ocean following the nuclear melt-through that occurred at the Fukushima Daiichi plant in March of 2011. Since that time, the flow of radioactive contaminants dumping into the ocean has continued unabated. Fish arriving at this juncture have been swimming in contaminants for all of their lives.
Radioactive cesium doesn’t sink to the sea floor, so fish swim through it and ingest it through their gills or by eating organisms that have already ingested it. It is a compound that does occur naturally in nature, however, the levels of cesium found in the tuna in 2012 had levels 3 percent higher than is usual. Measurements for this year haven’t been made available, or at least none that I have been able to find. I went looking for the effects of ingesting cesium. This is what I found:
When contact with radioactive cesium occurs, which is highly unlikely, a person can experience cell damage due to radiation of the cesium particles. Due to this, effects such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and bleeding may occur. When the exposure lasts a long time, people may even lose consciousness. Coma or even death may then follow. How serious the effects are depends upon the resistance of individual persons and the duration of exposure and the concentration a person is exposed to.
The half life of cesium 134 is 2.0652 years. For cesium 137, the half life is 30.17 years.
The Fukushima disaster is an ongoing battle with no signs that humans are gaining the upper hand. The only good news to come out of Japan has later been proven to be false and was nothing more than attempts by Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) to mislead the public and lull them into a sense of security while the company searched vainly for ways to contain the accident. This incident makes Three Mile Island and Chernobyl pale in comparison. Those were nuclear meltdowns. A nuclear melt-through poses a much more serious problem and is one that modern technology doesn’t have the tools to address. Two and a half years later and the contaminants are still flowing into the ocean and will continue to for the foreseeable future.
As for me, fish and seafood are now off the menu.
Fukushima radiation dispersal area
part 2 http://youtu.be/ayKbIUkHXdEPublished on Jul 3, 2013
WHY IS PACIFIC OCEAN TURNING INTO A BARREN DESERT?
worth watching the few seconds of gif animation of Pacific…
Hmmm, maybe the food chain is worth testing for radiation?
Maybe humans are worth testing for radiation?
Nahhhhhh, who cares? As long as the nuclear industry can dump poison in unlimited quantities, and claim it has hormesis health results, why bother, right?
THESE INVISIBLE HEAVY METAL RADIOACTIVE POISONS GO UP THE FOOD CHAIN AND CONCENTRATE EVERY STEP OF THE WAY, ALL THE WAY BACK TO HUMANS AT THE TOP
Zero Rads In Children And Adults Project – Negative Effects Of Chronic, Cumulative Man Made Radiation Exposure
Negative Effects Of Internal Radiation Exposure, Risk Models, Hormesis, Radiophobia, Radiation Monitoring Networks
ANOTHER TATAL POISON; SCIENTISTS STARTING TO SPEAK OUT ABOUT ROUNDUP
The World According To Monsanto; Aspartame, Nutrasweet, Equal, PCB And Roundup Secrets Exposed, Genetically Engineered (GE) Terminator Seeds
“17 Scientists Speak Out: Monsanto’s Roundup is Causing Cancer”
We have heard for decades that Roundup is PERFECTLY safe for you, your children, and your pets.
Think again. This molecule makes Nick’s TATAL list (toxic at the atomic level)
What if so much Roundup has been sprayed that we actually breathe the stuff? Not good.
It COULD be a factor in marine deaths via a reduction in phytoplankton. No?
TF2 is going to cause excessive amounts of ionizing atoms to flee their-never-supposed-to-be-breached containment vessels.
Neuronic damage to hominids at the molecular level is a certain, clear and present danger.
Humans may have “tamed” the atom, but in a sense, that horse can’t be ridden….at least for as long as forever.
Which we do not have.
Giving Thanks is about what we have now.
Sure wish I could see further into the future than I have been lately.
Ground water usually tends to offer itself up to the Universal force of Earth’s gravity, flowing to the sea.
Building a wall may procure vast profits for idiots, but it will do nothing for our genome.
Folks, start embracing geological time, and you’ll see how little Time we have left before ecosystems crash and burn.
TATAL MEGA NUCLEAR DISASTER = FUKUSHIMA
Fukushima Mega Nuclear Disaster Total Cost $1 – $10 TRILLION Dollars – Will Bankrupt Japan In The Longer Term; via @AGreenRoad
Worst Case Scenario Around The Fukushima Mega Nuclear Disaster, Vs Best Case Scenario Presented By Nuclear Industry
Please help AGRP get this news out… thanks for your generous and very appreciated support! What you support grows and expands. What you withhold support from shrinks, shrivels and disappears. Even .50 cents per month is a great help. What is teaching the science of sustainable health worth?